Christ’s Church of Tucson – Women’s Retreat 2010
(with guest speaker LaVon Sperling from Indian Hills Community Church)
Reflections of a Godly Woman
To download the files, right-click the link and click “Save Target As” or “Save Link As“.
Friday, August 6th, 2010
Session 1a – A Gentle and Quiet Spirit (LaVon Sperling) (handout)
Session 1b – Testimonies (Katy McHolm, Lynn Sugino)
Saturday, August 7th, 2010
Session 2 – An Encouraging Spirit (LaVon Sperling) (handout)
Session 3a – A Helpful Spirit (LaVon Sperling) (handout)
Session 3b - Q&A Panel (LaVon Sperling, Cathy Thomas, Becky McHolm)
.
The Character of Genuine Saving Faith
2 Corinthians 13:5
Test yourselves to see if you are in the faith; examine yourselves! Or do you not recognize this about yourselves, that Jesus Christ is in you—unless indeed you fail the test?
| I. | EVIDENCES THAT NEITHER PROVE NOR DISPROVE ONE’S FAITH | ||
| A. | Visible Morality: | Mt 19:16–21; 23:27. | |
| B. | Intellectual Knowledge: | Ro 1:21; 2:17ff. | |
| C. | Religious Involvement: | Mt 25:1–10 | |
| D. | Active Ministry: | Mt 7:21–24 | |
| E. | Conviction of Sin: | Ac 24:25 | |
| F. | Assurance: | Mt 23:1-39 | |
| G. | Time of Decision: | Lk 8:13, 14
|
|
| II. | THE FRUIT/PROOFS OF AUTHENTIC/TRUE CHRISTIANITY: | ||
| A. | Love for God: | Ps 42:1ff; 73:25; Lk 10:27; Ro 8:7 | |
| B. | Repentance from Sin: | Ps 32:5; Pr 28:13; Ro 7:14ff; 2Co 7:10; 1 John 1:8–10 | |
| C. | Genuine Humility: | Ps 51:17; Mt 5:1–12; James 4:6, 9ff. | |
| D. | Devotion to God’s Glory: | Ps 105:3; 115:1; Is 43:7, 48:10ff.; Jer 9:23, 24; 1Co 10:31. | |
| E. | Continual Prayer: | Lk 18:1; Eph 6:18ff.; Php 4:6ff.; 1Ti 2:1–4; James 5:16–18 | |
| F. | Selfless Love: | 1 John 2:9ff, 3:14; 4:7ff. | |
| G. | Separation from the World: | 1Co 2:12; James 4:4ff.; 1 John 2:15–17, 5:5 | |
| H. | Spiritual Growth: | Lk 8:15; Jn 15:1–6; Eph 4:12–16 | |
| I. | Obedient Living: | Mt 7:21; Jn 15:14ff.; Ro 16:26; 1Pe 1:2, 22; 1 John 2:3–5 | |
| If List I is true of a person and List II is false, there is cause to question the validity of one’s profession of faith. Yet if List II is true, then the top list will be also.
|
|||
| III. | THE CONDUCT OF THE GOSPEL: | ||
| A. | Proclaim it: | Mt 4:23 | |
| B. | Defend it: | Jude 3 | |
| C. | Demonstrate it: | Php 1:27 | |
| D. | Share it: | Php 1:5 | |
| E. | Suffer for it: | 2Ti 1:8 | |
| F. | Don’t hinder it: | 1Co 9:16 | |
| G. | Be not ashamed: | Ro 1:16 | |
| H. | Preach it: | 1Co 9:16 | |
| I. | Be empowered: | 1Th 1:5 | |
| J. | Guard it: | Gal 1:6–8 | |
MacArthur, J. (2006). The MacArthur study Bible : New American Standard Bible. Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers.
One of the Most Important Principles in Reading the Bible
by Pastor John Piper
Sometimes readers of the Bible see the conditions that God lays down for his blessing and they conclude from these conditions that our action is first and decisive, then God responds to bless us.
That is not right.
There are indeed real conditions that God often commands. We must meet them for the promised blessing to come. But that does not mean that we are left to ourselves to meet the conditions or that our action is first and decisive.
Here is one example to show what I mean.
In Jeremiah 29:13 God says to the exiles in Babylon, “You will seek me and find me, when you seek me with all your heart.” So there is a condition: When you seek me with all your heart, then you will find me. So we must seek the Lord. That is the condition of finding him.
True.
But does that mean that we are left to ourselves to seek the Lord? Does it mean that our action of seeking him is first and decisive? Does it mean that God only acts after our seeking?
No.
Listen to what God says in Jeremiah 24:7 to those same exiles in Babylon: “I will give them a heart to know that I am the Lord, and they shall be my people and I will be their God, for they shall return to me with their whole heart.”
So the people will meet the condition of returning to God with their whole heart. God will respond by being their God in the fullest blessing. But the reason they returned with their whole heart is that God gave them a heart to know him. His action was first and decisive.
So now connect that with Jeremiah 29:13. The condition there was that they seek the Lord with their whole heart. Then God will be found by them. But now we see that the promise in Jeremiah 24:7 is that God himself will give them such a heart so that they will return to him with their whole heart.
This is one of the most basic things people need to see about the Bible. It is full of conditions we must meet for God’s blessings. But God does not leave us to meet them on our own. The first and decisive work before and in our willing is God’s prior grace. Without this insight, hundreds of conditional statements in the Bible will lead us astray.
Let this be the key to all Biblical conditions and commands: “Work out your own salvation with fear and trembling, for it is God who works in you, both to will and to work for his good pleasure.” (Philippians 2:12-13). Yes, we work. But our work is not first or decisive. God’s is. “I worked harder than any of them, though it was not I, but the grace of God that is with me” (1 Corinthians 15:10).
By John Piper. © Desiring God. Website: http://www.desiringgod.org/.
The Covenants
by Pastor Dale Briggs - Christ’s Church of Tucson
The Covenants
Ephesians 3:6
09-06-09
Last week we began to consider the question of the relationship between the church and the Covenants. This question stems from our study of Ephesians 3:1-13 where Paul is writing about the mystery that is worthy of our suffering. In Ephesians 3:6 Paul begins to define the mystery in terms of its effects on the Gentile believer. The mystery has affected the Gentile believer by causing him to become fellow heirs, fellow members of the body and fellow partakers of the promise.
It is the Gentile’s position as a fellow partaker of the promise that raises the question of how does the church relate to the covenants. Last week we said that this promise is directly linked to the covenants mentioned in Ephesians 2:12. From our study of the covenants (Abraham and Davidic) we concluded that the promise spoken of here is the promise of redemption made possible by the work of Christ on the cross. This could also be seen in a study of the New Covenant.
If you will remember our study of the covenants showed us that the covenants have basically four elements: land, nation, blessing, and seed. The blessing element and the seed element have been fulfilled respectively by the finished redemptive work of Christ on the Cross and by Christ Himself. Every family on the earth (which includes both Jews and Gentiles) has been blessed by the Abrahamic Covenant because of the seed element and blessing element of the Abrahamic Covenant.
The seed element of the Abrahamic Covenant has had a physical fulfillment in the person of Jesus Christ. The blessing element of the Abrahamic Covenant has had a spiritual fulfillment in the redemptive work of Christ on the cross. Through these two elements comes the promise of redemption.
The mystery of Christ is defined in part by the Gentile believer’s partaking of the promise of redemption. This is made possible because there has been a physical fulfillment of the seed element and a spiritual fulfillment of the blessing element.
I ended last week saying that today we would seek to answer questions about the other two elements; the land and nation element. Have they also had some sort of fulfillment? Can we expect them to have spiritual fulfillments in the church? What if any will be the benefits of these two elements for the church? Should we still be expecting God to fulfill His covenantal promises made to Abraham by once again establishing Israel on the land promised to them and giving them full and everlasting possession of it and rest from their enemies?
I am not sure we will get to all of these questions today, because I am not satisfied with our understanding of the blessing element.
Last week we clearly saw where the seed element of the Abrahamic Covenant was fulfilled in Christ, but I do not believe we adequately understood that the redemptive work of Christ on the Cross is a spiritual fulfillment of blessing element of the Abrahamic Covenant.
Quickly let’s review the elements of the Covenants.
Four elements found in the covenants. I will be using the terms promises and elements interchangeably.
1) Land.
2) Nation.
3) Blessing.
4) Seed.
Plural: another reference to the twelve tribes of Judah which make up the nation of Israel.
Singular: used only in association with the blessing element.
Genesis 22:18 cf. Gal 3:16
Since the plural nature of the seed element is already represented in the nation element, I believe it is best to understand the element of a seed promise to be an exclusive reference to the promise of the Messiah.
Christ is the fulfillment of the seed promise, therefore His redemptive work on the cross could be loosely connected to the seed promise. But I believe it is better to see the redemptive work of Christ on the cross as a fulfillment of the blessing element. I think last week we made too strong of a connection between the seed element and redemption and too little if any connection between the blessing element and redemption.
I want to begin this Morning by focusing on the blessing element. The reason I want to begin with the blessing element is because I believe it is by far the most significant element of the Abrahamic Covenant. Without the spiritual fulfillment of the blessing element there could be no fulfillment of the land or nation element either spiritual or physical. No matter what side of the fence you are on when it comes to issue of the covenants I believe everyone must see the spiritual fulfillment of the blessing element as being absolutely indispensable to any blessing received from God.
Last week we saw where Christ is the physical fulfillment of the seed promise of the Abrahamic Covenant, but we did not give enough attention to how the redemptive work of Christ on the cross is a spiritual fulfillment of the blessing element of the Abrahamic Covenant.
The spiritual fulfillment of the blessing element of the Abrahamic Covenant is found in the redemptive work of Christ on the cross.
The only way to receive the benefits of any of the elements of the Abrahamic covenant is for those to whom the covenant was made to express effectual faith in the promises and the Promise Giver of the covenant. Our faith would have no salvific value if it were not for the redemptive work of Christ on the cross. Apart from the spiritual fulfillment of the blessing element of the Abrahamic Covenant seen in the work of Christ on the cross faith would be ineffective in enabling one to receive the other elements of promise found in the Abrahamic Covenant.
THE BLESSING ELEMENT IS THE PRINCIPLE ELEMENT OF THE ABRAHAMIC COVENANT
Principle element because the gospel is its spiritual fulfillment
The promise of blessing is first mentioned Genesis 12:3 where there is no mention of the seed. The promise that was made to Abraham in Gen.22:18 and repeated in the presence of Isaac in Gen.26:4 and then in the presence of Jacob in Genesis 28:14.
Notice what Paul says about this element in Gal.3:8
The Gentile is saved because of this element of promise found in the Abrahamic Covenant.
Principle element because it is a promise given to Christ.
Read Genesis 22:15-18 The term “seed” is used three times in this passage. The first two have obvious references to plurality. But the last time there is no reference to plurality. The only other time the “term” seed is used in connection with the Abrahamic Covenant and does not have a clear reference to plurality is in Gen.26:4 and Gen.28:14. Both cases that speak of a blessing coming to the nations or families of the earth.
Turn with me now back to Galatians 3:16. Paul must be speaking of the promise of a blessing because this is the only time where the term “seed” is not clearly a reference to more than one.
Who are the families/nations of the earth?
It is important to point out that all the families of the earth is a reference to a representation of individuals from every people group not to every individual in every family. God never says everyone will be saved. God never says every one will be receive the blessing spoken of here. That would be universalism; a teaching that says Hell will be empty and all will go to Heaven.
When God says every family will be blest through Abraham and Christ He is saying that no people group will be excluded from this blessing. There will be people from every part of the world who receive this blessing. The blessing will be extended to the ends of the earth. In a broad sense the phrase all families of the earth could accurately be interpreted as referring to Gentile and Jew. Thus, Paul is saying that God promised Abraham and Christ that the whole world would be blest through them. The blessing through Christ is obvious: redemption. There will be some from all the families of the earth who will be blest through the redemption of their sins made possible by the sacrifice of Christ on the cross.
God gave Abraham and Christ the same promise. Through them the families of the earth would be blest. This blessing comes though the redemptive work of Christ on the cross. This makes the blessing promise the most important promise of the Abrahamic Covenant. Without faith no one can experience any of the benefits of the promises of the Abrahamic Covenant The only reason faith has this value is because of redemption provided through the blessing Element of the Abrahamic Covenant
Why does faith work? It works because the redemptive work of Christ on the cross works.
Does a partial spiritual fulfillment of the covenant require a full spiritual fulfillment of the covenant?
One must be careful not to use the spiritual fulfillment of the blessing element as grounds that the land and nation elements must also have spiritual fulfillments.
The spiritual fulfillment of the blessing element does not negate the future physical fulfillment of the land and nation elements rather the spiritual fulfillment of the blessing element paves the way for the possibility of a physical fulfillment of the land element and nation element.
If we are going to say that the land element and nation element of the Abrahamic Covenant have spiritual fulfillments in the NT, then we must see these clearly stated in the NT. The following two NT passages are examples of what might be considered as passages that teach land and nation elements have been spiritually fulfilled in the NT.
We will first consider the nation element of the Abrahamic Covenant.
Exodus 19:5,6 People of God’s possession
Kingdom of priests.
Holy nation
I Peter 2:9,10 A chosen race
Royal priesthood
Holy Nation
People of God’s possession.
Is it possible that the church has replaced Israel, yes it is possible.
Is it possible that the church is extremely similar to Israel and shares with Israel the same divine purpose for existing. Yes this too is possible.
Does I Peter 2:9,10 clearly show that God views the relationship between Israel and the church as being one of strong continuity. Is this passage clearly teaching us that the church has replaced Israel or that God no longer has a distinct plan for the people of Israel and He is now solely focusing on the church?
Remember the clarity of Galatians 3:8 when it equated the gospel with the blessing promise. “…the gospel was preached before hand saying All the nations will be blessed in you.”
Remember the clarity of Galatians 3:16 when it equated the seed promise with Christ.
“… and to your seed that is Christ.
No where have we read where God has said in the NT something to the equivalent of I will make you a great nation that is the church.
Now we will consider the land element of the Abrahamic Covenant.
The land was obviously the land of Canaan.
Joshua 21:43-45
Before we compare this passage with its NT counterpart I want to address the issue as to whether or not this is a physical fulfillment of the land promise in the Abrahamic Covenant.
Compare Joshua 21:43-45 with Joshua 23:1-5
Same time period. The Israel in both passages has been given rest from all her enemies on every side.
In Joshua 21:43-45 Israel has received all the land that was promised to their fathers and they possessed it and lived in it.
In Joshua 23:1-5 There are enemies yet to be driven from the land and there is land yet to be possessed. There are promises connected to the land yet to be realized.
Often times when God is speaking of the fathers of Israel He is referring to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, yet there are times when the fathers of Israel is a reference to the generation of adults that God brought out of Egypt. Thus, the reference to fathers could be a reference to the generation of adults brought out of Egypt and the oaths could be a reference to God’s promise that they would wonder and gradually die in the wilderness for 40 years because of their rebellion and that their children would enter into the promised land. The reference to promises made to the house of Israel might also support this theory. I want to emphasize that this is a theory and one that has not been adequately tested, thus we should not put to much weight on it.
We need to remember the faithfulness of God to bless faith and punish rebellion.
What we also need to remember is that God’s plan was and always has been to fulfill the land promise by giving the land to a generation of Abraham’s descendants that manifested perpetual faith in God. The concept of perpetual faith is very critical when one studies the fulfillment of the land promise. God makes it very clear to Moses that continual faith will be blest with continual possession of the land, but rebellion and revolt will be meant with at least oppression from one’s enemies and if rebellion continues it will be meant with expulsion from the land.
With this in mind we can see where yes in one sense the Israelites in Joshua 21:43-45 did receive possession of the promise land, yet in another sense the jury is still out on that generation to see whether they would retain an everlasting possession of the land. Their faith had not been fully tested. The nations God left in the land were meant to test the faith of Israel, a test that the first 2 chapters of judges shows that they failed.
So we need to realize that Joshua 21:43-45 does not prove a physical fulfillment of the land promise. But it is a reference to the physical land. Can this reference possibly be used by the NT to show that God has now fulfilled this promise spiritually?
Hebrews 4:8-11. In Hebrews 4:8-11 the writer of Hebrews speaks of a rest that Joshua gave. This is a reference to the rest from enemies the people of Israel received when they came into the promise land. Now we know that Joshua did not actually give the rest, God gave the rest, but He God exercised His sovereign power through the leadership of Joshua.
The point the writer of Hebrews is making is that the rest the people received in Joshua’s day is not the ultimate rest. The ultimate rest is the Sabbath rest. The Sabbath was set aside to remember that God ceased on the seventh day from his creative work because the creative work was finished.
But, is the writer of Hebrews saying the rest mentioned in Joshua 21 is a type that finds its anti-type in the Sabbath rest believers find in Christ? Are we now to see the Sabbath rest in Christ as the spiritual fulfillment of the land element given in the Abrahamic Covenant?
What does it mean to enter into this Sabbath rest? V.10. When one enters into this Sabbath rest one is saying I am done depending upon my works as a means to have peace with God. Why or How can one makes such a decision? Because just as God’s creative is finished so the work of making peace with God is finished. It was finished on the cross.
But why is the writer of Hebrews comparing the rest that faith in Christ gives us from our works with the rest given the Israelites in Joshua’s day?
4:1 The writer of Hebrews does not want us to come short of this rest.
4:3 One must believe to enter this rest. There is the issue of faith. But who is represented by the “they” who are not entering the rest? The ones represented by the “they” in verse 3 are the same ones represented by the “they” in verse 2. Ones who hear the word and it does not profit them because they do not unite their hearing of the word with faith. Just what exactly is the writer of Hebrews talking about? When did these people hear the word and not unite it with faith? Look at Hebrews 3:16-19. The adult generation of Israelites coming out of Egypt heard the good word of God when He promised to give them the promise land. They heard this promise but did not unite the hearing of the promise with a belief in the promise and they were not allowed to enter into the rest of the promise land.
The writer of Hebrews is giving us two responses to the hearing of the word of promise and the consequence of each response.
Disbelief brings wrath. Belief brings peace or rest.
The writer of Hebrews is not using the land rest as a type pointing to the anti-type seen in the Sabbath rest. The writer of Hebrews is warning against disbelief in the Sabbath rest found in Christ. The writer of Hebrews only mentions the land rest because he wants to be sure his readers do not focus on it to the point where they cannot see the greater rest found in Christ.
The writer of Hebrews is not telling us that the spiritual rest we have in Christ is a spiritual fulfillment of the land promise found in the Abrahamic Covenant. The writer of Hebrews is telling us that there is a greater rest than the rest that comes with the fulfillment of the land promise. This greater rest is the rest that comes through the promise of the finished work of Christ on the cross.
How does one receive the benefit of the promise found in the finish work of Christ on the cross? The same way one receives the benefit of the land promise found in the Abrahamic Covenant. Faith. Have faith in the promise and the promise giver.
Is the spiritual rest that we find in the finished work of Christ on the cross greater than the physical rest the nation of Israel finds in their physical promised land? Of course it is.But, does that mean that God is no longer concerned about keeping His promise to Abraham about the physical land? No it does not.
The blessing of the spiritual rest found in the finished work of Christ on the cross far exceeds the blessing of the physical rest Israel will find when they are given a physical fulfillment of the land promise. But this does not mean that God has replaced his promise of a physical rest for Israel in the physical promise land with his promise to provide the church with a spiritual rest in Christ.
God said the promise of blessing found in the Abrahamic Covenant is spiritually fulfilled through the gospel.
God said the seed promise is fulfilled in Christ.
God did not say the land promise is fulfilled through the spiritual rest one finds in the finished work of Christ on the cross.
God did not say the nation promise is fulfilled in the church.
If scripture clearly teaches that the promise of Israel’s everlasting possession of the land and the promise that they will continue to exist as a nation have spiritual fulfillments Then I could be more comfortable with admitting that we should not look to see God fully restore the nation of Israel to the land God promised to give them as an everlasting possession. As it stands I still believe the over all weight of the authority of scripture is telling us that God is not finished with Israel and that we can expect Him to fulfill His covenantal promises made to Abraham by once again establishing Israel on the land promised to them and giving them full and everlasting possession of it and rest from their enemies.
Why has the land promise not been fulfilled?
Because of the lack of perpetual faith in the promises of God on the part of Israel.
When will the land promise be fulfilled?
When the nation of Israel manifests perpetual faith in the promises of God.
Will the nation of Israel ever manifest a perpetual faith in the promises of God?
According to the OT prophets, Yes
According to the writers of the NT, Yes
According to Jesus, Yes.
Thesis: The blessing element of the Abrahamic Covenant is the principle element of the Abrahamic Covenant. Does its spiritual fulfillment necessitate that the land and seed elements also have spiritual fulfillments?
The blessing element is the principle element of the Abrahamic Covenant because:
The gospel is its spiritual fulfillment
It is a promise given to Christ.
Obviously the blessing element is primary in importance when compared to the physical land and nation elements.
But does the subordinate status of the physical land and nation elements render them non-existent concepts in God’s future dealings with humanity? No.
Is there any reason to believe that the land and nation elements of the Abrahamic Covenant have spiritual fulfillments? No.
Mercy Ministries and Helping the Poor
I’d like to recommend a book that shares the Christian perspective on many of today’s issues like euthanasia and suicide, environmentalism, immigration and border control, entertainment, birth control & surrogacy, divorce, and more. It’s called: “Right Thinking in a World Gone Wrong: A Biblical Response to Today’s Most Controversial Issues”.
http://www.amazon.com/Right-Thinking-World-Gone-Wrong/dp/0736926437
It also has a chapter called “Help for the Hurting and Hope for the Lost” by Jesse Johnson which is very helpful on the topic of ‘Mercy Ministries’.
Here are some excerpts from the chapter:
Mercy ministry refers to meeting the needs of the poor and the destitute, the widows and the orphans, especially in the church but also in the world (Galatians 6:10). James describes this kind of ministry as religion which is “pure and undefiled” (James 1:27). It is a form of ministry that is woven into the fabric of Scripture because it has its foundation in the character of God Himself. (210).
Dozens of Old Testament verses stress the importance of showing compassion to those in need, Significantly, they are not followed by exceptions or disclaimers if the poverty was the result of rash decisions or sin. Often poverty is the result of foolish living. Nevertheless, to neglect the needy who cross our paths is to sin. (211)
When the apostles sent Paul out, they gave him only one specific charge: “They only asked us to remember the poor – the very thing I was also eager to do” (Galatians 2:10). How Paul fulfilled that command is noted in his epistles. He took collections from various churches to help meet the needs of destitute believers in Jerusalem (Romans 15:26). In fact he told the church to take this collection every week so that when he arrived, there would be no shortage for the poor in the Jerusalem church (1 Corinthians 16:1-4). It is evident that care for the poor and needy, especially within the church, is a mark of New Testament ministry. (211 – 212)
In the Old Testament, Jews were not commanded to go into all the world and preach the gospel. They were commanded to stay in Israel and keep the Mosaic law so that the world could see the glory of God through their obedience. But in the New Testament, Christians are called to go into all the world and preach the gospel. When people receive the gospel and become believers, they are then added to the church, and they obey God out of their love for Him.
It should be noted at this point that there is a careful distinction in the New Testament between tasks given to the church corporately and tasks given to Christians individually. Individual Christians are to love their neighbors, their enemies, and those in need. They are to meet needs as they see them, as they are able. A Christians first duty is to care for the needs of his family; his second duty is to meet the needs of those in the church; and his third duty is to those outside the church (Galatians 6:9-10; 1 Timothy 4:10; 5:4,8) Meanwhile, the church’s main task is to spread the gospel throughout the world by equipping saints for the work of the ministry. In addition, the church is called to care for the widows and the poor in her midst. In other words, the church is to care for Christians. The thrust of biblical commands concerning the poor, which were given to the church as a whole, relates to taking care of the needs of Christians, and not the poor in general.
When people look to the church to end poverty, halt human trafficking, bring drinking water to Africa, or cure AIDS, they are looking in the wrong place. The church was not commissioned to do any of these tasks. Elders are not appointed based on their ability to politic or irrigate. But as individual Christians live holy lives, they will inevitably find themselves in situations where they can make a difference.
Clarity is what’s needed about what the Bible calls and does not call Christians to do. We are not called to end global hunger, fight homelessness, or feel guilty about having running water. We are called to show compassion to the poor, to open our hearts to them, to spread the gospel, and to hate materialism. We are to make sacrifices to advance the gospel around the world. And as the church is strengthened around the world, there will be more Christians loving the poor and caring for the orphans in the neediest of places.
The Bible lays obligation for mercy ministry at the feet (and in the hearts) of individuals. Individuals are called to love the poor and care for the needy as they have opportunity. Hiding behind a donation is not sufficient. As Paul explained in 1 Corinthians 13:3, it is possible to give all you have to the poor without loving them, but with such action, God is not pleased. (212-213)
It is possible…for churches to faithfully fulfill their primary duties (evangelizing the lost and edifying the saints) while also caring for the material needs of those in their midst. It is also possible for pastors to train people to care for others as they spread the gospel through the context of their everyday lives.
So it must be unequivocally stated that Christians are to show mercy and kindness to all with whom they interact, both inside and outside the church. …The American Dream may promote people to pursue health, wealth, and prosperity, but the gospel prompts Christians to a life of stewardship and sacrifice, all while fleeing the love of money and cultivating a love for others. (214)
…mosquito nets are not the end for which God created the world. It is critical for churches to view missions for what they are: the expansion and strengthening of the church of Jesus Christ around the world. Consider this comment from the president of Detroit Baptist Seminary: “All missionary ministry should be intricately connected to the planting of local churches. Church planting is not one of the things missionaries are to do, it is the thing!” God’s plan for social transformation is the gospel. Corruption will never be eliminated, and the poor we will always have with us. But the church in America can use her wealth to bring the gospel into the midst of poverty, and in doing so, lives will be changed. This is what it means to love the poor. God’s character is put on display in the ministry of His missionaries….As churches are established and pastors trained, lasting social change comes. This is never the primary goal, but is always the byproduct of authentic Christian living. (215)
Excerpts taken from:
“Right Thinking in a World Gone Wrong: A Biblical Response to Today’s Most Controversial Issues”.
from a chapter called “Help for the Hurting and Hope for the Lost” by Jesse Johnson.
http://www.amazon.com/Right-Thinking-World-Gone-Wrong/dp/0736926437
The Rich Man and Lazarus – A real story or a parable?
Luke 16 – The Rich Man and Lazarus
Luke 16:19-31 (NASB)
(19) “Now there was a rich man, and he habitually dressed in purple and fine linen, joyously living in splendor every day.
(20) “And a poor man named Lazarus was laid at his gate, covered with sores,
(21) and longing to be fed with the crumbs which were falling from the rich man’s table; besides, even the dogs were coming and licking his sores.
(22) “Now the poor man died and was carried away by the angels to Abraham’s bosom; and the rich man also died and was buried.
(23) “In Hades he lifted up his eyes, being in torment, and saw Abraham far away and Lazarus in his bosom.
(24) “And he cried out and said, ‘Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus so that he may dip the tip of his finger in water and cool off my tongue, for I am in agony in this flame.’
(25) “But Abraham said, ‘Child, remember that during your life you received your good things, and likewise Lazarus bad things; but now he is being comforted here, and you are in agony.
(26) ‘And besides all this, between us and you there is a great chasm fixed, so that those who wish to come over from here to you will not be able, and that none may cross over from there to us.’
(27) “And he said, ‘Then I beg you, father, that you send him to my father’s house—
(28) for I have five brothers—in order that he may warn them, so that they will not also come to this place of torment.’
(29) “But Abraham said, ‘They have Moses and the Prophets; let them hear them.’
(30) “But he said, ‘No, father Abraham, but if someone goes to them from the dead, they will repent!’
(31) “But he said to him, ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be persuaded even if someone rises from the dead.’ ”
Is this a real story or a parable? Is this a real story or a story Jesus made up?
Some commentaries say this must be a real story because:
-
- It contains a name (Lazarus).
- But there is no law in the Bible that says ‘parables cannot include people who have a name’.
- Although it is unique and the only time Jesus actually gives a proper name to a character in His parable is not to say that it is therefore not a parable. We need to look a little more closely to discern.
I’m convinced that this is in fact a parable, it is a story that is imaginary, a story that Jesus himself invented as He did so many stories to make a spiritual point.
- This story is similar to other parables, look at how it begins. Look at its introduction.
|
Parable |
How the parable begins… |
|
Rich Man and Lazarus |
Luke 16:19 Now there was a rich man, and he habitually dressed in purple and fine linen… |
|
The Good Samaritan |
Luke 10:30 A man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell among robbers… |
|
The Great Banquet |
Luke 14:16 A man was giving a big dinner, and he invited many… |
|
The Prodigal Son |
Luke 15:11-12 A man had two sons. The younger of them said to his father… |
|
The Ten Minas |
Luke 19:12 A nobleman went to a distant country to receive a kingdom for himself… |
|
And many others outside the gospel of Luke are started the same way, so this is pretty familiar parabolic introduction |
|
- This gives a spiritual truth of great significance (as are other parables).
- It would seem that if this was a historical story, then the main character would also have a name and there would even be a location.
- The circumstances that occur in the parable also show that it cannot be true. It is imaginary and the details are to make a point.
- People in hell can’t see into heaven (as in v. 26 and v. 23)
- They can’t see or find Father Abraham and talk to him (as in v. 24)
- There’s also nothing that says that angels take you to heaven when you die (as in v. 22)
Radmacher, Earl D. ; Allen, Ronald Barclay ; House, H. Wayne: The Nelson Study Bible : New King James Version. Nashville : T. Nelson Publishers, 1997, S. Lk 16:23
The Problem of Evil
The text below was edited from a transcript of a message called “Why Does Evil Dominate the World?” and from “The Origin of Evil” by John MacArthur. www.gty.org
The Problem of Evil
I think in order to appropriately address the issue of the existence of evil, we must set aside all human considerations and focus on the nature of God and His righteous standard. Divine justice is where the discussion must begin. John MacArthur defines divine justice as an essential attribute of God whereby He infinitely, perfectly, and independently does exactly what He wants to do and when He wants to do it. Because He is the standard of justice, by very definition, whatever He does is inherently just.
God does not do something because it is good and right, but rather, the thing is good and right because God wills it and works it. By nature God is just and righteous and therefore whatever He does is just and right because of His nature. We as fallen humans cannot impose our own ideas onto our understanding of God’s working. So, the fundamental issue we must start at is to go to the scriptures to see how God Himself, in His perfect righteousness, decides to act. His actions will always be righteous and true.
Some would say that it can’t be true that God has both a full knowledge of evil and the full power to prevent it and still let it come into existence because that means He ordained it. However, if God had the full knowledge of it and the full power to deal with it and it exists, then He ordained it. Either He didn’t have the knowledge (not omniscient), or He didn’t have the power (not omnipotent), so you have to reinvent God.
There are some people who are just short answer folks. You say, “Where did evil come from?” And they’ll say, “Oh it came from Adam and Eve.” Really? How did it get introduced to Adam and Eve? “Well, oh yeah, that’s right, it came from the snake.” Well how did the snake get to a place where he could be embodied by Satan and how did Satan get to be Satan in which he was tempting people to do evil? “Oh well, he came from…oh, he came from heaven, didn’t he?”
So where did evil originate? Evil originated where? In heaven? Yes, evil originated in heaven in an angelic rebellion right under the nose of God. You think that was a shock? Then you don’t have a God who is absolutely omniscient. You think God couldn’t stop it once it got going? Couldn’t put an end to it right on the spot? Then you have a God who is not all powerful. No matter how you deal with it, if you sustain the biblical doctrine of God, God becomes ultimately responsible for the existence of evil.
Now when you boil all this down, there are a number of categories in which theodicies can be created. The first category is metaphysical. That is to say evil is inevitable. It is a corollary of good. It is necessary. It’s Yin Yang. It’s a necessary opposite of one thing that exists by the very metaphysics of its existence, the opposite can exist as well. It is not that God created evil. It is not that God ordained evil. It is that evil is because good is. It is simply a negation. It is simply a privation. It is the absence of the opposite of. If you have an infinity, you have a finitude. If you have a good, you have an evil.
There’s some truth in that to some limited degree metaphysically. There is also the more theological approach to that metaphysical idea and it is this, that because God created humanity good, the potential for evil existed within that creation and man exercising his will chose the evil. So it didn’t really come from God, it came from man. It didn’t really come from God, it came from Lucifer who made the same choice in heaven. That was strongly the argument of Augustine and Aquinas in ancient times. And there is truth in that. There is the holiness of God and there is the sinfulness of the creature. But it leaves too much to metaphysical inevitability and it asks the question, since good exists and evil must then exist, is that perpetually true? And when we get to heaven and the new heaven and the new earth because that is eternal and perfect good, will we always be staring down the barrel of potential evil again because it’s a metaphysical necessity?
There’s a second kind of theodicy. Let’s drop the metaphysical approach to theodicy and let’s introduce the autonomous theodicy, or theodicies. A number of people come into this category to develop their theodicies. This is the category that suggests the cause of evil is the abuse of free will. And again we’re back to our Arminian friends. This is the abuse of free will. And this basically says the highest good to God is free will. Free will trumps everything on God’s scale, even evil. God could have prevented evil, but He wanted free will to exist and when He allowed free will to exist, therefore evil exists because those free and autonomous creatures choose evil. And because free will was more important as a reality than eliminating evil, evil exists. Evil exists because God exalts free will. Free will trumps evil on God’s value scale so that God had to allow for the possibility of evil in order to preserve the more highly prized autonomy that protects Him from injustice. Again, the bottom line is you can’t make God responsible for anything, so the greatest good in the creation is free will; angels have a free will, at least initially; humans have a free will, they make choices, and that’s the greater good, that’s the higher value to God even if it means sin and evil exist. Humans must have the self determined freedom to act. If God acts as a primary cause for people’s choices, they would not be free. If God decided they would be coerced and compelled and that would violate their will and we should have a completely free will. That’s the highest good. This gets God off the hook again; at least it appears to on a shallow level. But again, it requires reinventing a God, who values your will over His own. This is inventing a God who values everybody’s will over His own and that’s not the God we read about in the Scripture.
If God knew people would choose sin and hell, why did He go ahead and create them anyway? Why did He design free will? He could decide what the noblest of all virtues was, why make it free will if it’s going to end up like this and you’re going to have to go to Plan B just to recover from the exercise of these myriad of free wills?
So you can see that an autonomous theodicy as a category has to deny the direct involvement of God as He is revealed to be in the Old Testament. Does He not know what people are going to do? Or is giving them the freedom to do it more important than the presence of evil? If God has both knowledge and power, then He had to give men the free will to start with and He knew exactly what they would do with it and He went ahead and gave it to them and therefore in the end He had to ordain evil. It doesn’t solve any problem except to diminish the glory of God.
To design a God with limited knowledge, to design a God with limited power, to design a God who is more concerned about the will of every single human being than His own will is to design a God that is not the biblical God. If God is not in total control of evil, if He has not ordained it, and if He does not have it under complete control at every millisecond of history, then this universe is out of control at the most crucial point. If God is not in control of this completely, then how and when will He get the knowledge and the power to get it under control? Would you rather have a God trying to get control of evil, or a God completely in control of it? Take your choice. But the God of the Bible is complete control of evil for His own purposes. It is really heresy to say that the world is full of evil apart from a predetermined plan and purpose by God that is far above the willy-nilly choices of people.
So what do we know up to now? Evil exists. God exists. God wills evil to exist. He did not create it. He could not create it. But He did not prevent it. He ordained it. He willed it. He willed it because He had a purpose for it. This is critical.
Let me put it to you simply: God is not responsible for evil. His creatures are. God is not responsible for evil. His creatures are. Everything that God created was “very Good”, everything. This is affirmed throughout the scripture. In Habakkuk 1:13, it says God’s “eyes are too pure to approve evil” and that He “can not look on wickedness with favor”. 1 Corinthians 14:33 says “God is not a God of confusion”. Confusion is a product of sin. 1 John 1:5 says “God is Light, and in Him there is no darkness at all”. James 1:13 says “God cannot be tempted by evil, and He Himself does not tempt anyone”. 1 John 2:16 explains that “all that is in the world,” all evil categorically, “the lust of the flesh and the lust of the eyes and the boastful pride of life, is not from the Father, but is from the world”. Psalm 5:4 says that He is “not a God who takes pleasure in wickedness; No evil dwells with You.” In fact, on a positive note, Isaiah 6, the antiphonal cry of the angels was that God was “Holy, holy, holy.” We see a glimpse of that, of course, when Jesus came into the world; God in human flesh. He was holy, harmless, undefiled, and separate from sinners. God is not evil. God does not do evil. He cannot be tempted to do evil. He never tempts anybody else to do evil. God is not responsible for evil.
The source of evil, the source of sin, is outside God. When God created angels and God created humans, he gave them intelligence. He gave them reason, and he gave them choice. And there is a sequence. I put those words in that order for a purpose. Intelligence gave them the ability to understand things. Reason gave them the ability to process that understanding toward behavior. And choice gave them the freedom to determine that behavior. Intelligence, reason, and choice. Bottom line: With what they knew, and with the ability they had to process that information, they would be brought to a choice. And whether angels or men, they would have the choice either to obey God or not to obey God.
Listen to this: To disobey God was to initiate evil. Evil is not the presence of something. Evil is the absence of righteousness. You can’t create evil, because evil doesn’t exist as a created entity. It doesn’t exist as a created reality. Evil is a negative. Evil is the absence of perfection. It’s the absence of holiness. It’s the absence of goodness. It’s the absence of righteousness. Evil became a reality only when creatures chose to disobey. Evil came into existence initially then in the fall of angels; and then next, in the fall of Adam and Eve. Just put it this way in your mind. Evil is not a created thing. Evil is not a substance. Evil is not an entity. Evil is not a being. Evil is not a force. Evil is not some floating spirit. Evil is a lack of moral perfection. God created absolute perfection. Wherever a lack of that exists, sin exists. And that cannot exist in the nature of God or in anything that God makes. Evil comes into existence when God’s creatures fall short of the standard of moral perfection.
Now, let me take it a step further. God did not create evil. He did not author evil. He did not make evil. But listen carefully, very important: God did decree to use evil as a part of his eternal plan. He will not be culpable for it. He did not bring it into existence. That would be impossible because God is good, all good and only good. Therefore, whatever comes out of Him is all good and only good. God can, therefore, produce only good. And what is evil but the absence of that good, which is a choice made by the reasonings based upon the information revealed to his creatures? But, God was not caught off guard. In fact, God decreed that evil would be part of his plan. He is not the creator of evil, and He is not the cause of evil. He did not bring evil into existence in a cosmic sense, and He did not and does not bring evil into existence in a personal sense. He is not the cause of sin, nor is He the cause of sins in the lives of people. But He does use it for His purposes. And that’s why in Isaiah 45:7 says that God creates “calamity”. Some older translations say He “creates evil”. That is a really poor translation, and not true. God does create “calamity”. And if you read the context of Isaiah 45:7, it is clear that judgment is the issue. God does not create evil, but God does bring judgment on evil, creating therefore the calamity by which evil is judged. Now, listen carefully: Scripture written by God always assigns the guilt and responsibility for all sin to creatures; never to God. Never to God. That’s all we know. I’ve taken you as deep as I can go. There’s nowhere else to go. That’s all we know. Beyond that, we operate in faith. We do know some things. We know God is holy, right? We know he is too pure to look on iniquity; can’t tolerate evil. We know He “tempts no man,” neither is tempted by any man. We know he is “Holy, holy, holy,” all the things we went through. “No evil dwells in Him.” “He is all light and no darkness.” We know that. We believe that. God is not the author of confusion. He is not the source of sin. We know that. We believe that. Sin comes into existence when the standard of moral perfection is not met, and that is an act based upon intellect, reason and choice made by his creatures.
If God had a purpose for evil, if God wills evil to exist, what is the purpose for evil?
Some great theologians and biblical scholars from the seventeen hundreds put together The Westminster Confession. In it, it says “God, from all eternity did, by the most wise and holy counsel of His own will, freely, and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass. Yet so as thereby neither is God the author of sin, nor is violence offered to the will of the creatures, nor is the liberty or contingency of second-hand causes taken away, but rather established.”
Sinfulness proceeds only from the creature and not from God who being most holy and righteous neither can be the author and approver of sin. But then the Westminster Confession says all that God decrees and all that God providentially brings to pass is all to the praise of His glory.
They got it right. The reason for God ordaining evil is for the praise of His glory.
So when the question comes up: Why would God allow sin? We can only speculate. There’s no specific statement. But I think you can make a fairly reasonable speculation beyond which I cannot go and it is this: What did sin coming into the world bring about? I would say it brought about three things. These are the three reasons why I believe God allowed evil.
Number one, it brought about the salvation of sinners, right? God had to allow sin. God had to decree sin in the plan, though never the author of it, in order that he might save sinners. Well, why did God want to save sinners? To put on display attributes that otherwise never would have been manifest. How is God going to show grace if there aren’t any sinners? How is God going to show mercy if there aren’t any sinners? That was a part of God’s nature that God wanted to display for His own glory throughout all eternity. So God provided a means in which he could demonstrate grace and demonstrate mercy. He also wanted to show love; love that is so far-reaching that it can reach even his own enemies who hate him. How’s He going to show that if he doesn’t have any enemies? So God allows evil in order that He might demonstrate grace and mercy and forgiveness and salvation.
Secondly, He allows evil in order that He might display his wrath; in order that he might put his wrath on display, his anger on display, his judgment on display. How would God ever reveal that part of His true and eternal nature if there were not an opportunity to judge sinners? And so all you can do is look at redemptive history, and you see the salvation of sinners and the damnation of sinners, and that is what goes on. And you ultimately see a place prepared for those who were damned and a place prepared for those who were saved. And you must conclude then that the eternal purpose of God was to save some and judge some in order that he might demonstrate both his grace and his wrath.
And then I’d like to throw a third thought in there. I believe that God allowed sin in order that he might forever destroy it. As long as His creatures have any measure of freedom, as long as his creatures have intelligence; that is, they can know and reason; that is, they can process that knowledge toward behavior and choice; that is, they can choose what to do. As long as they have that capacity, there is a potential for them to fall short of the standard, right? To make the wrong choice. So there is choice, and the potential of a wrong choice is there. A measure of freedom is given to the creatures by which they can choose to honor God, by which they can choose to dishonor Him. As long as that is there, then the reality, the potential reality of evil exists when the wrong choice is made. I believe that once the wrong choice is made, then God goes into action. And one, He can demonstrate his grace in salvation; two, He can demonstrate his wrath in judgment; and three, He can then finally destroy evil. It’s almost as if God wanted evil to come to the surface so that he could excise it. That’s what’s going to happen when the whole of redemptive history is complete; when all the saved are saved, and all the lost are cast into the lake of fire, then death and hell are thrown into the lake of fire. What does that mean? No more death, no more hell, no more judgment. Why? Because there won’t be any more sin. And when you go into heaven, there’s nothing there that smacks of a sinful world, right? There’s no more sorrow, no more sadness, no more sin, no more dying, no more death.
So I think God decreed evil within his plan, without creating it, for those three reasons: To save sinners, to judge sinners, and to once and for all and forever destroy evil. It was always potentiated. As long as it was possible, it would need to come to the surface so God could excise it.
Summing it up, there is no external cause of sin, outside the creature. There’s no force floating out there that God created. It is the absence of perfection. There is no deterministic cause and effect; that is to say, some fatalism. It’s just choice. Within God’s decree, he allowed for that choice, knew those choices would be made the way they were made, planned that into the decree in order to display both his grace, his wrath, and to put a final and eternal end to sin. But always: The one who chose evil was the source of it. In the case of Lucifer, he was the source of evil initially in the angelic realm. And he got a third of the other angels to get along with him and join. The same happened with Adam and Eve, only it had a different effect. With angels, they all sinned their own sin, and nobody’s sin passed to anybody else, because they don’t procreate. But in the case of Adam and Eve, when Adam and Eve made the wrong choice, all humanity went with them, because we all come out of the loins of Adam and Eve. So the source of evil is outside of God. The source of evil is the creature.
Let me ask you a simple question to help you answer the bigger question. Is God more glorious because of sin existing or less glorious? Throughout all the eons of eternity will God receive more glory from His creatures because sin existed.
All that really matters is the eternal glory of God!
Rom 3:5-6 But if our unrighteousness demonstrates the righteousness of God, what shall we say? The God who inflicts wrath is not unrighteous, is He? (I am speaking in human terms.) 6 May it never be! For otherwise, how will God judge the world?
Would you understand the righteousness of God if you didn’t understand unrighteousness?
Rom 5:8 But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.
Our being sinners allows God to put His great love on open display at the cross.
Rom 9:22-23 What if God, although willing to demonstrate His wrath and to make His power known, endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction? 23 And He did so to make known the riches of His glory upon vessels of mercy, which He prepared beforehand for glory.
God had to “endure with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction” so He could display His wrath and full eternal power. God also willed to make known, to display, His mercy to the “vessels of mercy, which He prepared beforehand for glory”.
Prior to sin, God was not worshipped fully for His righteousness against the backdrop of unrighteousness. He couldn’t demonstrate His great love until he showed it against enemy, rebel sinners.
Rom 9:17 For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, “FOR THIS VERY PURPOSE I RAISED YOU UP, TO DEMONSTRATE MY POWER IN YOU, AND THAT MY NAME MIGHT BE PROCLAIMED THROUGHOUT THE WHOLE EARTH.”
Isa 45:7 The One forming light and creating darkness, Causing well-being and creating calamity; I am the LORD who does all these.
In Job 38, 39, 40, and 42 God shows Job that His ways are too wonderful for him to understand, that he is insignificant and that he cannot find fault with the Almighty.
Job 38:1-7 Then the LORD answered Job out of the whirlwind and said, 2 “Who is this that darkens counsel By words without knowledge? 3 “Now gird up your loins like a man, And I will ask you, and you instruct Me! 4 “Where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth? Tell Me, if you have understanding, 5 Who set its measurements? Since you know. Or who stretched the line on it? 6 “On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, 7 When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? ….
Job 39:1-2 “Do you know the time the mountain goats give birth? Do you observe the calving of the deer? 2 “Can you count the months they fulfill, Or do you know the time they give birth? ….
Job 40:1-4 Then the LORD said to Job, 2 “Will the faultfinder contend with the Almighty? Let him who reproves God answer it.” 3 Then Job answered the LORD and said, 4 “Behold, I am insignificant; what can I reply to You? I lay my hand on my mouth.
Job 42:1-6 Then Job answered the LORD and said, 2 “I know that You can do all things, And that no purpose of Yours can be thwarted. 3 ‘Who is this that hides counsel without knowledge?’ “Therefore I have declared that which I did not understand, Things too wonderful for me, which I did not know.” 4 ‘Hear, now, and I will speak; I will ask You, and You instruct me.’ 5 “I have heard of You by the hearing of the ear; But now my eye sees You; 6 Therefore I retract, And I repent in dust and ashes.”
Tough talk from God and Job buckles and says “God, I have no right to question You, You are God and You have every right to put Your glory on full display.” And evil makes that happen. We will spend forever and ever in the presence of God extolling Him in ways that never would be possible had He not allowed and ordained (without ever creating or being the source of it) the evil that temporarily dominates the creation. And in His perfect timing, it will all be over and He will destroy this entire universe in a holocaust described by Peter as the elements melting with fervent heat and the creation of a new heaven and a new earth in which only eternal righteousness exists, but we will forever worship with an understanding of the full display of His glory.
May we thank God for the insight that comes to us from His Word. He’s told us why. It’s not left to mystery. I’m God, I do what I do for My own glory. How wonderful is it that He has chosen us to be part of that eternal assembly who will give Him glory and who will sing praise to the Lamb who was slain. May we be in awe of God, that He has chosen us to be a part of that redeemed community who will understand forever the glory that came and was fully displayed because of sin. What a privilege.
1 John Study – Authentic Christian or False Christian?
created by David Ellingson
The apostle John was an eye-witness concerning the life of Jesus, the Word of Life. He writes what he has heard, and seen, and looked at, and touched (1:1-3). John testifies and proclaims these things so that we may have fellowship “with the Father and with His Son Jesus Christ” and “so that our joy may be made complete” (1:4).
The overall theme of 1 John is “a recall to the fundamentals of the faith” or “back to the basics of Christianity.” The apostle deals with certainties, not opinions or conjecture. He expresses the absolute character of Christianity in very simple terms; terms that are clear and unmistakable, leaving no doubt as to the fundamental nature of those truths. A warm, conversational, and above all, loving tone occurs, like a father having a tender, intimate conversation with his children.
First John also is pastoral, written from the heart of a pastor who has concern for his people. As a shepherd, John communicated to his flock some very basic, but vitally essential, principles reassuring them regarding the basics of the faith. He desired them to have joy regarding the certainty of their faith rather than being upset by the false teaching and current defections of some (1:4).
The book’s viewpoint, however, is not only pastoral but also polemical; not only positive but also negative. John refutes the defectors with sound doctrine, exhibiting no tolerance for those who pervert divine truth. He labels those departing from the truth as “false prophets” (4:1), “those who are trying to deceive” (2:26; 3:7), and “antichrists” (2:18). He pointedly identifies the ultimate source of all such defection from sound doctrine as demonic (4:1–7).
The constant repetition of 3 sub-themes reinforces the overall theme regarding faithfulness to the basics of Christianity: happiness (1:4), holiness (2:1), and security (5:13). By faithfulness to the basics, his readers will experience these 3 results continually in their lives. These 3 factors also reveal the key cycle of true spirituality in 1 John: a proper belief in Jesus produces obedience to His commands; obedience issues in love for God and fellow believers (e.g., 3:23, 24). When these 3 (sound faith, obedience, love) operate in concert together, they result in happiness, holiness and assurance. They constitute the evidence, the litmus test, of a true Christian.
MacArthur, J. (2006). The MacArthur study Bible : New American Standard Bible. Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers.
|
True & Authentic Christians
|
False Christians/Non-Christians
|
|
Obey and Keep His Commandments 1 John 1:7 (NASB95) 1 John 2:3 (NASB95) 1 John 2:29 (NASB95)
|
Disobey and Neglect His Commandments 1 John 1:6 (NASB95) 1 John 3:6b (NASB95) 1 John 3:10 (NASB95)
|
|
Love 1 John 2:7-8 (NASB95)
|
Not Loving 1 John 2:9 (NASB95) |
|
Belief 1 John 2:20-21 (NASB95) 1 John 2:24-25 (NASB95) 1 John 5:1 (NASB95) 1 John 5:11-12a (NASB95) 1 John 5:13-15 (NASB95) |
Disbelief 1 John 2:19 (NASB95) 1 John 4:3 (NASB95) |
|
Not Worldy 1 John 2:15a (NASB95) 1 John 4:4 (NASB95) |
Worldy 1 John 2:15b-16 (NASB95) 1 John 4:5-6 (NASB95) |
|
Forgiveness of Sins 1 John 1:9 (NASB95)
Admission of Sin 1 John 1:8 (NASB95)
|
|
|
God 1 John 1:5 (NASB95) Jesus His Son 1 John 3:5 (NASB95) |
|