Christ’s Church of Tucson – Women’s Retreat 2010

(with guest speaker LaVon Sperling from Indian Hills Community Church)

Reflections of a Godly Woman

To download the files, right-click the link and click “Save Target As” or “Save Link As“.
Friday, August 6th, 2010
      Session 1a – A Gentle and Quiet Spirit (LaVon Sperling)  (handout)
      Session 1b – Testimonies (Katy McHolm, Lynn Sugino)

Saturday, August 7th, 2010

      Session 2 – An Encouraging Spirit (LaVon Sperling)  (handout)
      Session 3a – A Helpful Spirit (LaVon Sperling)  (handout)
      Session 3b - Q&A Panel (LaVon Sperling, Cathy Thomas, Becky McHolm)

Retreat Bulletin

.

Survey: What Articles and Resources Do You Want?

The Character of Genuine Saving Faith

Download MS Word version of this article!

2 Corinthians 13:5 

Test yourselves to see if you are in the faith; examine yourselves! Or do you not recognize this about yourselves, that Jesus Christ is in you—unless indeed you fail the test?

 
I. EVIDENCES THAT NEITHER PROVE NOR DISPROVE ONE’S FAITH
  A. Visible Morality: Mt 19:16–21; 23:27.
  B. Intellectual Knowledge: Ro 1:21; 2:17ff.
  C. Religious Involvement: Mt 25:1–10
  D. Active Ministry: Mt 7:21–24
  E. Conviction of Sin: Ac 24:25
  F. Assurance: Mt 23:1-39
  G. Time of Decision: Lk 8:13, 14

 

II. THE FRUIT/PROOFS OF AUTHENTIC/TRUE CHRISTIANITY:
  A. Love for God: Ps 42:1ff; 73:25; Lk 10:27; Ro 8:7
  B. Repentance from Sin: Ps 32:5; Pr 28:13; Ro 7:14ff; 2Co 7:10; 1 John 1:8–10
  C. Genuine Humility: Ps 51:17; Mt 5:1–12; James 4:6, 9ff.
  D. Devotion to God’s Glory: Ps 105:3; 115:1; Is 43:7, 48:10ff.; Jer 9:23, 24; 1Co 10:31.
  E. Continual Prayer: Lk 18:1; Eph 6:18ff.; Php 4:6ff.; 1Ti 2:1–4; James 5:16–18
  F. Selfless Love: 1 John 2:9ff, 3:14; 4:7ff.
  G. Separation from the World: 1Co 2:12; James 4:4ff.; 1 John 2:15–17, 5:5
  H. Spiritual Growth: Lk 8:15; Jn 15:1–6; Eph 4:12–16
  I. Obedient Living: Mt 7:21; Jn 15:14ff.; Ro 16:26; 1Pe 1:2, 22; 1 John 2:3–5
If List I is true of a person and List II is false, there is cause to question the validity of one’s profession of faith. Yet if List II is true, then the top list will be also.

 

III. THE CONDUCT OF THE GOSPEL:
  A. Proclaim it: Mt 4:23
  B. Defend it: Jude 3
  C. Demonstrate it: Php 1:27
  D. Share it: Php 1:5
  E. Suffer for it: 2Ti 1:8
  F. Don’t hinder it: 1Co 9:16
  G. Be not ashamed: Ro 1:16
  H. Preach it: 1Co 9:16
  I. Be empowered: 1Th 1:5
  J. Guard it: Gal 1:6–8

 

 

MacArthur, J. (2006). The MacArthur study Bible : New American Standard Bible. Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers.

One of the Most Important Principles in Reading the Bible

Download MS Word version of this article!

by Pastor John Piper

Sometimes readers of the Bible see the conditions that God lays down for his blessing and they conclude from these conditions that our action is first and decisive, then God responds to bless us.

That is not right.

There are indeed real conditions that God often commands. We must meet them for the promised blessing to come. But that does not mean that we are left to ourselves to meet the conditions or that our action is first and decisive.

Here is one example to show what I mean.

In Jeremiah 29:13 God says to the exiles in Babylon, “You will seek me and find me, when you seek me with all your heart.” So there is a condition: When you seek me with all your heart, then you will find me. So we must seek the Lord. That is the condition of finding him.

True.

But does that mean that we are left to ourselves to seek the Lord? Does it mean that our action of seeking him is first and decisive? Does it mean that God only acts after our seeking?

No.

Listen to what God says in Jeremiah 24:7 to those same exiles in Babylon: “I will give them a heart to know that I am the Lord, and they shall be my people and I will be their God, for they shall return to me with their whole heart.”

So the people will meet the condition of returning to God with their whole heart. God will respond by being their God in the fullest blessing. But the reason they returned with their whole heart is that God gave them a heart to know him. His action was first and decisive.

So now connect that with Jeremiah 29:13. The condition there was that they seek the Lord with their whole heart. Then God will be found by them. But now we see that the promise in Jeremiah 24:7 is that God himself will give them such a heart so that they will return to him with their whole heart.

This is one of the most basic things people need to see about the Bible. It is full of conditions we must meet for God’s blessings. But God does not leave us to meet them on our own. The first and decisive work before and in our willing is God’s prior grace. Without this insight, hundreds of conditional statements in the Bible will lead us astray.

Let this be the key to all Biblical conditions and commands: “Work out your own salvation with fear and trembling, for it is God who works in you, both to will and to work for his good pleasure.” (Philippians 2:12-13). Yes, we work. But our work is not first or decisive. God’s is. “I worked harder than any of them, though it was not I, but the grace of God that is with me” (1 Corinthians 15:10).

By John Piper. © Desiring God. Website: http://www.desiringgod.org/.

The Covenants

Download MS Word version of this article!

by Pastor Dale Briggs -  Christ’s Church of Tucson

The Covenants

Ephesians 3:6
09-06-09
Last week we began to consider the question of the relationship between the church and the Covenants. This question stems from our study of Ephesians 3:1-13 where Paul is writing about the mystery that is worthy of our suffering. In Ephesians 3:6 Paul begins to define the mystery in terms of its effects on the Gentile believer. The mystery has affected the Gentile believer by causing him to become fellow heirs, fellow members of the body and fellow partakers of the promise.

It is the Gentile’s position as a fellow partaker of the promise that raises the question of how does the church relate to the covenants. Last week we said that this promise is directly linked to the covenants mentioned in Ephesians 2:12. From our study of the covenants (Abraham and Davidic) we concluded that the promise spoken of here is the promise of redemption made possible by the work of Christ on the cross. This could also be seen in a study of the New Covenant.

If you will remember our study of the covenants showed us that the covenants have basically four elements: land, nation, blessing, and seed. The blessing element and the seed element have been fulfilled respectively by the finished redemptive work of Christ on the Cross and by Christ Himself. Every family on the earth (which includes both Jews and Gentiles) has been blessed by the Abrahamic Covenant because of the seed element and blessing element of the Abrahamic Covenant.

The seed element of the Abrahamic Covenant has had a physical fulfillment in the person of Jesus Christ. The blessing element of the Abrahamic Covenant has had a spiritual fulfillment in the redemptive work of Christ on the cross. Through these two elements comes the promise of redemption.
The mystery of Christ is defined in part by the Gentile believer’s partaking of the promise of redemption. This is made possible because there has been a physical fulfillment of the seed element and a spiritual fulfillment of the blessing element.

I ended last week saying that today we would seek to answer questions about the other two elements; the land and nation element. Have they also had some sort of fulfillment? Can we expect them to have spiritual fulfillments in the church? What if any will be the benefits of these two elements for the church? Should we still be expecting God to fulfill His covenantal promises made to Abraham by once again establishing Israel on the land promised to them and giving them full and everlasting possession of it and rest from their enemies?

I am not sure we will get to all of these questions today, because I am not satisfied with our understanding of the blessing element.
Last week we clearly saw where the seed element of the Abrahamic Covenant was fulfilled in Christ, but I do not believe we adequately understood that the redemptive work of Christ on the Cross is a spiritual fulfillment of blessing element of the Abrahamic Covenant.

Quickly let’s review the elements of the Covenants.

Four elements found in the covenants. I will be using the terms promises and elements interchangeably.

1) Land.

2) Nation.

3) Blessing.

4) Seed.

           Plural: another reference to the twelve tribes of Judah which make up the nation of Israel.

           Singular: used only in association with the blessing element.

Genesis 22:18 cf. Gal 3:16
Since the plural nature of the seed element is already represented in the nation element, I believe it is best to understand the element of a seed promise to be an exclusive reference to the promise of the Messiah.

Christ is the fulfillment of the seed promise, therefore His redemptive work on the cross could be loosely connected to the seed promise. But I believe it is better to see the redemptive work of Christ on the cross as a fulfillment of the blessing element. I think last week we made too strong of a connection between the seed element and redemption and too little if any connection between the blessing element and redemption.

I want to begin this Morning by focusing on the blessing element. The reason I want to begin with the blessing element is because I believe it is by far the most significant element of the Abrahamic Covenant. Without the spiritual fulfillment of the blessing element there could be no fulfillment of the land or nation element either spiritual or physical. No matter what side of the fence you are on when it comes to issue of the covenants I believe everyone must see the spiritual fulfillment of the blessing element as being absolutely indispensable to any blessing received from God.
Last week we saw where Christ is the physical fulfillment of the seed promise of the Abrahamic Covenant, but we did not give enough attention to how the redemptive work of Christ on the cross is a spiritual fulfillment of the blessing element of the Abrahamic Covenant.

The spiritual fulfillment of the blessing element of the Abrahamic Covenant is found in the redemptive work of Christ on the cross.
The only way to receive the benefits of any of the elements of the Abrahamic covenant is for those to whom the covenant was made to express effectual faith in the promises and the Promise Giver of the covenant. Our faith would have no salvific value if it were not for the redemptive work of Christ on the cross. Apart from the spiritual fulfillment of the blessing element of the Abrahamic Covenant seen in the work of Christ on the cross faith would be ineffective in enabling one to receive the other elements of promise found in the Abrahamic Covenant.

THE BLESSING ELEMENT IS THE PRINCIPLE ELEMENT OF THE ABRAHAMIC COVENANT
Principle element because the gospel is its spiritual fulfillment

The promise of blessing is first mentioned Genesis 12:3 where there is no mention of the seed. The promise that was made to Abraham in Gen.22:18 and repeated in the presence of Isaac in Gen.26:4 and then in the presence of Jacob in Genesis 28:14.
Notice what Paul says about this element in Gal.3:8

The Gentile is saved because of this element of promise found in the Abrahamic Covenant.
Principle element because it is a promise given to Christ.

Read Genesis 22:15-18 The term “seed” is used three times in this passage. The first two have obvious references to plurality. But the last time there is no reference to plurality. The only other time the “term” seed is used in connection with the Abrahamic Covenant and does not have a clear reference to plurality is in Gen.26:4 and Gen.28:14. Both cases that speak of a blessing coming to the nations or families of the earth.

Turn with me now back to Galatians 3:16. Paul must be speaking of the promise of a blessing because this is the only time where the term “seed” is not clearly a reference to more than one.
Who are the families/nations of the earth?

It is important to point out that all the families of the earth is a reference to a representation of individuals from every people group not to every individual in every family. God never says everyone will be saved. God never says every one will be receive the blessing spoken of here. That would be universalism; a teaching that says Hell will be empty and all will go to Heaven.

When God says every family will be blest through Abraham and Christ He is saying that no people group will be excluded from this blessing. There will be people from every part of the world who receive this blessing. The blessing will be extended to the ends of the earth. In a broad sense the phrase all families of the earth could accurately be interpreted as referring to Gentile and Jew. Thus, Paul is saying that God promised Abraham and Christ that the whole world would be blest through them. The blessing through Christ is obvious: redemption. There will be some from all the families of the earth who will be blest through the redemption of their sins made possible by the sacrifice of Christ on the cross.

God gave Abraham and Christ the same promise. Through them the families of the earth would be blest. This blessing comes though the redemptive work of Christ on the cross. This makes the blessing promise the most important promise of the Abrahamic Covenant. Without faith no one can experience any of the benefits of the promises of the Abrahamic Covenant The only reason faith has this value is because of redemption provided through the blessing Element of the Abrahamic Covenant

Why does faith work? It works because the redemptive work of Christ on the cross works.

Does a partial spiritual fulfillment of the covenant require a full spiritual fulfillment of the covenant?

One must be careful not to use the spiritual fulfillment of the blessing element as grounds that the land and nation elements must also have spiritual fulfillments.
The spiritual fulfillment of the blessing element does not negate the future physical fulfillment of the land and nation elements rather the spiritual fulfillment of the blessing element paves the way for the possibility of a physical fulfillment of the land element and nation element.

If we are going to say that the land element and nation element of the Abrahamic Covenant have spiritual fulfillments in the NT, then we must see these clearly stated in the NT.  The following two NT passages are examples of what might be considered as passages that teach land and nation elements have been spiritually fulfilled in the NT.

We will first consider the nation element of the Abrahamic Covenant.
Exodus 19:5,6 People of God’s possession

Kingdom of priests.

Holy nation
I Peter 2:9,10 A chosen race

Royal priesthood

Holy Nation

People of God’s possession.
Is it possible that the church has replaced Israel, yes it is possible.

Is it possible that the church is extremely similar to Israel and shares with Israel the same divine purpose for existing. Yes this too is possible.
Does I Peter 2:9,10 clearly show that God views the relationship between Israel and the church as being one of strong continuity. Is this passage clearly teaching us that the church has replaced Israel or that God no longer has a distinct plan for the people of Israel and He is now solely focusing on the church?

Remember the clarity of Galatians 3:8 when it equated the gospel with the blessing promise. “…the gospel was preached before hand saying All the nations will be blessed in you.”
Remember the clarity of Galatians 3:16 when it equated the seed promise with Christ.

“… and to your seed that is Christ.
No where have we read where God has said in the NT something to the equivalent of I will make you a great nation that is the church.
Now we will consider the land element of the Abrahamic Covenant.
The land was obviously the land of Canaan.

Joshua 21:43-45
Before we compare this passage with its NT counterpart I want to address the issue as to whether or not this is a physical fulfillment of the land promise in the Abrahamic Covenant.
Compare Joshua 21:43-45 with Joshua 23:1-5

Same time period. The Israel in both passages has been given rest from all her enemies on every side.
In Joshua 21:43-45 Israel has received all the land that was promised to their fathers and they possessed it and lived in it.

In Joshua 23:1-5 There are enemies yet to be driven from the land and there is land yet to be possessed. There are promises connected to the land yet to be realized.

Often times when God is speaking of the fathers of Israel He is referring to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, yet there are times when the fathers of Israel is a reference to the generation of adults that God brought out of Egypt. Thus, the reference to fathers could be a reference to the generation of adults brought out of Egypt and the oaths could be a reference to God’s promise that they would wonder and gradually die in the wilderness for 40 years because of their rebellion and that their children would enter into the promised land. The reference to promises made to the house of Israel might also support this theory. I want to emphasize that this is a theory and one that has not been adequately tested, thus we should not put to much weight on it.
We need to remember the faithfulness of God to bless faith and punish rebellion.

What we also need to remember is that God’s plan was and always has been to fulfill the land promise by giving the land to a generation of Abraham’s descendants that manifested perpetual faith in God. The concept of perpetual faith is very critical when one studies the fulfillment of the land promise. God makes it very clear to Moses that continual faith will be blest with continual possession of the land, but rebellion and revolt will be meant with at least oppression from one’s enemies and if rebellion continues it will be meant with expulsion from the land.

With this in mind we can see where yes in one sense the Israelites in Joshua 21:43-45 did receive possession of the promise land, yet in another sense the jury is still out on that generation to see whether they would retain an everlasting possession of the land. Their faith had not been fully tested. The nations God left in the land were meant to test the faith of Israel, a test that the first 2 chapters of judges shows that they failed.

So we need to realize that Joshua 21:43-45 does not prove a physical fulfillment of the land promise. But it is a reference to the physical land. Can this reference possibly be used by the NT to show that God has now fulfilled this promise spiritually?

Hebrews 4:8-11. In Hebrews 4:8-11 the writer of Hebrews speaks of a rest that Joshua gave. This is a reference to the rest from enemies the people of Israel received when they came into the promise land. Now we know that Joshua did not actually give the rest, God gave the rest, but He God exercised His sovereign power through the leadership of Joshua.

The point the writer of Hebrews is making is that the rest the people received in Joshua’s day is not the ultimate rest. The ultimate rest is the Sabbath rest. The Sabbath was set aside to remember that God ceased on the seventh day from his creative work because the creative work was finished.

But, is the writer of Hebrews saying the rest mentioned in Joshua 21 is a type that finds its anti-type in the Sabbath rest believers find in Christ? Are we now to see the Sabbath rest in Christ as the spiritual fulfillment of the land element given in the Abrahamic Covenant?

What does it mean to enter into this Sabbath rest? V.10. When one enters into this Sabbath rest one is saying I am done depending upon my works as a means to have peace with God. Why or How can one makes such a decision? Because just as God’s creative is finished so the work of making peace with God is finished. It was finished on the cross.

But why is the writer of Hebrews comparing the rest that faith in Christ gives us from our works with the rest given the Israelites in Joshua’s day?
4:1 The writer of Hebrews does not want us to come short of this rest.

4:3 One must believe to enter this rest. There is the issue of faith. But who is represented by the “they” who are not entering the rest? The ones represented by the “they” in verse 3 are the same ones represented by the “they” in verse 2. Ones who hear the word and it does not profit them because they do not unite their hearing of the word with faith. Just what exactly is the writer of Hebrews talking about? When did these people hear the word and not unite it with faith? Look at Hebrews 3:16-19. The adult generation of Israelites coming out of Egypt heard the good word of God when He promised to give them the promise land. They heard this promise but did not unite the hearing of the promise with a belief in the promise and they were not allowed to enter into the rest of the promise land.
The writer of Hebrews is giving us two responses to the hearing of the word of promise and the consequence of each response.

Disbelief brings wrath. Belief brings peace or rest.

The writer of Hebrews is not using the land rest as a type pointing to the anti-type seen in the Sabbath rest. The writer of Hebrews is warning against disbelief in the Sabbath rest found in Christ. The writer of Hebrews only mentions the land rest because he wants to be sure his readers do not focus on it to the point where they cannot see the greater rest found in Christ.
The writer of Hebrews is not telling us that the spiritual rest we have in Christ is a spiritual fulfillment of the land promise found in the Abrahamic Covenant. The writer of Hebrews is telling us that there is a greater rest than the rest that comes with the fulfillment of the land promise. This greater rest is the rest that comes through the promise of the finished work of Christ on the cross.
How does one receive the benefit of the promise found in the finish work of Christ on the cross? The same way one receives the benefit of the land promise found in the Abrahamic Covenant. Faith. Have faith in the promise and the promise giver.

Is the spiritual rest that we find in the finished work of Christ on the cross greater than the physical rest the nation of Israel finds in their physical promised land? Of course it is.But, does that mean that God is no longer concerned about keeping His promise to Abraham about the physical land? No it does not.

The blessing of the spiritual rest found in the finished work of Christ on the cross far exceeds the blessing of the physical rest Israel will find when they are given a physical fulfillment of the land promise. But this does not mean that God has replaced his promise of a physical rest for Israel in the physical promise land with his promise to provide the church with a spiritual rest in Christ.
God said the promise of blessing found in the Abrahamic Covenant is spiritually fulfilled through the gospel.

God said the seed promise is fulfilled in Christ.

God did not say the land promise is fulfilled through the spiritual rest one finds in the finished work of Christ on the cross.

God did not say the nation promise is fulfilled in the church.

If scripture clearly teaches that the promise of Israel’s everlasting possession of the land and the promise that they will continue to exist as a nation have spiritual fulfillments Then I could be more comfortable with admitting that we should not look to see God fully restore the nation of Israel to the land God promised to give them as an everlasting possession. As it stands I still believe the over all weight of the authority of scripture is telling us that God is not finished with Israel and that we can expect Him to fulfill His covenantal promises made to Abraham by once again establishing Israel on the land promised to them and giving them full and everlasting possession of it and rest from their enemies.

Why has the land promise not been fulfilled?

Because of the lack of perpetual faith in the promises of God on the part of Israel.

When will the land promise be fulfilled?

When the nation of Israel manifests perpetual faith in the promises of God.

Will the nation of Israel ever manifest a perpetual faith in the promises of God?

According to the OT prophets, Yes

According to the writers of the NT, Yes

According to Jesus, Yes.

Thesis: The blessing element of the Abrahamic Covenant is the principle element of the Abrahamic Covenant. Does its spiritual fulfillment necessitate that the land and seed elements also have spiritual fulfillments?
The blessing element is the principle element of the Abrahamic Covenant because:
The gospel is its spiritual fulfillment

It is a promise given to Christ.
Obviously the blessing element is primary in importance when compared to the physical land and nation elements.
But does the subordinate status of the physical land and nation elements render them non-existent concepts in God’s future dealings with humanity?  No.
Is there any reason to believe that the land and nation elements of the Abrahamic Covenant have spiritual fulfillments?  No.

Mercy Ministries and Helping the Poor

Download MS Word version of this article!

I’d like to recommend a book that shares the Christian perspective on many of today’s issues like euthanasia and suicide, environmentalism, immigration and border control, entertainment, birth control & surrogacy, divorce, and more.  It’s called: “Right Thinking in a World Gone Wrong: A Biblical Response to Today’s Most Controversial Issues”.
http://www.amazon.com/Right-Thinking-World-Gone-Wrong/dp/0736926437

It also has a chapter called “Help for the Hurting and Hope for the Lost” by Jesse Johnson which is very helpful on the topic of ‘Mercy Ministries’.

Here are some excerpts from the chapter:

Mercy ministry refers to meeting the needs of the poor and the destitute, the widows and the orphans, especially in the church but also in the world (Galatians 6:10).  James describes this kind of ministry as religion which is “pure and undefiled” (James 1:27).  It is a form of ministry that is woven into the fabric of Scripture because it has its foundation in the character of God Himself. (210).
Dozens of Old Testament verses stress the importance of showing compassion to those in need,  Significantly, they are not followed by exceptions or disclaimers if the poverty was the result of rash decisions or sin.  Often poverty is the result of foolish living.  Nevertheless, to neglect the needy who cross our paths is to sin. (211)
When the apostles sent Paul out, they gave him only one specific charge: “They only asked us to remember the poor – the very thing I was also eager to do”  (Galatians 2:10).  How Paul fulfilled that command is noted in his epistles.  He took collections from various churches to help meet the needs of destitute believers in Jerusalem (Romans 15:26).  In fact he told the church to take this collection every week so that when he arrived, there would be no shortage for the poor in the Jerusalem church (1 Corinthians 16:1-4).  It is evident that care for the poor and needy, especially within the church, is a mark of New Testament ministry. (211 – 212)

In the Old Testament, Jews were not commanded to go into all the world and preach the gospel.  They were commanded to stay in Israel and keep the Mosaic law so that the world could see the glory of God through their obedience.   But in the New Testament, Christians are called to go into all the world and preach the gospel.  When people receive the gospel and become believers, they are then added to the church, and they obey God out of their love for Him.

It should be noted at this point that there is a careful distinction in the New Testament between tasks given to the church corporately and tasks given to Christians individually.   Individual Christians are to love their neighbors, their enemies, and those in need.  They are to meet needs as they see them, as they are able.  A Christians first duty is to care for the needs of his family; his second duty is to meet the needs of those in the church; and his third duty is to those outside the church (Galatians 6:9-10; 1 Timothy 4:10; 5:4,8)  Meanwhile, the church’s main task is to spread the gospel throughout the world by equipping saints for the work of the ministry.  In addition, the church is called to care for the widows and the poor in her midst.  In other words, the church is to care for Christians.  The thrust of biblical commands concerning the poor, which were given to the church as a whole, relates to taking care of the needs of Christians, and not the poor in general.

When people look to the church to end poverty, halt human trafficking, bring drinking water to Africa, or cure AIDS, they are looking in the wrong place.  The church was not commissioned to do any of these tasks.   Elders are not appointed based on their ability to politic or irrigate.  But as individual Christians live holy lives, they will inevitably find themselves in situations where they can make a difference.

Clarity is what’s needed about what the Bible calls and does not call Christians to do.  We are not called to end global hunger, fight homelessness, or feel guilty about having running water.  We are called to show compassion to the poor, to open our hearts to them, to spread the gospel, and to hate materialism.  We are to make sacrifices to advance the gospel around the world.  And as the church is strengthened around the world, there will be more Christians loving the poor and caring for the orphans in the neediest of places. 

The Bible lays obligation for mercy ministry at the feet (and in the hearts) of individuals.  Individuals are called to love the poor and care for the needy as they have opportunity. Hiding behind a donation is not sufficient.  As Paul explained in 1 Corinthians 13:3, it is possible to give all you have to the poor without loving them, but with such action, God is not pleased. (212-213)
It is possible…for churches to faithfully fulfill their primary duties (evangelizing the lost and edifying the saints) while also caring for the material needs of those in their midst.  It is also possible for pastors to train people to care for others as they spread the gospel through the context of their everyday lives.

So it must be unequivocally stated that Christians are to show mercy and kindness to all with whom they interact, both inside and outside the church.   …The American Dream may promote people to pursue health, wealth, and prosperity, but the gospel prompts Christians to a life of stewardship and sacrifice, all while fleeing the love of money and cultivating a love for others. (214)
…mosquito nets are not the end for which God created the world.  It is critical for churches to view missions for what they are:  the expansion and strengthening of the church of Jesus Christ around the world.  Consider this comment from the president of Detroit Baptist Seminary:  “All missionary ministry should be intricately connected to the planting of local churches.  Church planting is not one of the things missionaries are to do, it is the thing!”  God’s plan for social transformation is the gospel.  Corruption will never be eliminated, and the poor we will always have with us.  But the church in America can use her wealth to bring the gospel into the midst of poverty, and in doing so, lives will be changed.  This is what it means to love the poor.  God’s character is put on display in the ministry of His missionaries….As churches are established and pastors trained, lasting social change comes.   This is never the primary goal, but is always the byproduct of authentic Christian living. (215)

When all is said and done, mercy ministry looks like nothing more than Christians being faithful to the Great Commission and being obedient to genuinely love people wherever they go.  This is true mercy ministry, and this is true religion.  We are in turn to be faithful to minister to those around us and to live sacrificially so that we can send people to places where needs are greater.  This is the means God has established to bring hope to this hurting and broken world. (216)
 
Excerpts taken from: 
Right Thinking in a World Gone Wrong: A Biblical Response to Today’s Most Controversial Issues”.
from a chapter called “Help for the Hurting and Hope for the Lost” by Jesse Johnson.
http://www.amazon.com/Right-Thinking-World-Gone-Wrong/dp/0736926437
 
 

The Rich Man and Lazarus – A real story or a parable?

Luke 16 – The Rich Man and Lazarus

 

Luke 16:19-31 (NASB)
(19) “Now there was a rich man, and he habitually dressed in purple and fine linen, joyously living in splendor every day.
(20)
“And a poor man named Lazarus was laid at his gate, covered with sores,
(21)
and longing to be fed with the crumbs which were falling from the rich man’s table; besides, even the dogs were coming and licking his sores.
(22)
“Now the poor man died and was carried away by the angels to Abraham’s bosom; and the rich man also died and was buried.
(23)
“In Hades he lifted up his eyes, being in torment, and saw Abraham far away and Lazarus in his bosom.
(24)
“And he cried out and said, ‘Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus so that he may dip the tip of his finger in water and cool off my tongue, for I am in agony in this flame.’
(25)
“But Abraham said, ‘Child, remember that during your life you received your good things, and likewise Lazarus bad things; but now he is being comforted here, and you are in agony.
(26)
‘And besides all this, between us and you there is a great chasm fixed, so that those who wish to come over from here to you will not be able, and that none may cross over from there to us.’
(27)
“And he said, ‘Then I beg you, father, that you send him to my father’s house—
(28)
for I have five brothers—in order that he may warn them, so that they will not also come to this place of torment.’
(29)
“But Abraham said, ‘They have Moses and the Prophets; let them hear them.’
(30)
“But he said, ‘No, father Abraham, but if someone goes to them from the dead, they will repent!’
(31)
“But he said to him, ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be persuaded even if someone rises from the dead.’ ”

Is this a real story or a parable?  Is this a real story or a story Jesus made up? 

 

Some commentaries say this must be a real story because:

  1.  
    1. It contains a name (Lazarus).
    2. But there is no law in the Bible that says ‘parables cannot include people who have a name’.
    3. Although it is unique and the only time Jesus actually gives a proper name to a character in His parable is not to say that it is therefore not a parable.  We need to look a little more closely to discern.

 

I’m convinced that this is in fact a parable, it is a story that is imaginary, a story that Jesus himself invented as He did so many stories to make a spiritual point. 

 

  1. This story is similar to other parables, look at how it begins.  Look at its introduction.

 

Parable

How the parable begins…

Rich Man and Lazarus

Luke 16:19  Now there was a rich man, and he habitually dressed in purple and fine linen…

The Good Samaritan

Luke 10:30  A man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell among robbers…

The Great Banquet

Luke 14:16  A man was giving a big dinner, and he invited many…

The Prodigal Son

Luke 15:11-12  A man had two sons. The younger of them said to his father…

The Ten Minas

Luke 19:12  A nobleman went to a distant country to receive a kingdom for himself…

And many others outside the gospel of Luke are started the same way, so this is pretty familiar parabolic introduction

 

  1. This gives a spiritual truth of great significance (as are other parables).
    1. It would seem that if this was a historical story, then the main character would also have a name and there would even be a location.
  2. The circumstances that occur in the parable also show that it cannot be true.  It is imaginary and the details are to make a point.
    1. People in hell can’t see into heaven (as in v. 26 and v. 23)
    2. They can’t see or find Father Abraham and talk to him (as in v. 24)
    3. There’s also nothing that says that angels take you to heaven when you die (as in v. 22)
Conclusion:
The poor man goes into the presence of God, the presence of Abraham, in the Heaven of heavens.  The rich man goes to hell to be tormented.  This is the great reversal.  This is the first jolting element of the story.  This will cause a stunning reaction, because the Jews believed their theological system was developed to teach them that if you lived a life like this rich man, this was God’s blessing; and if you lived a life like this poor man, this was God’s curse.  They would’ve expected the rich man to enter into Heaven and be seated next to Abraham.  They would’ve expected the poor man to end up in hell in torment, just a continued extension of the wretchedness that was being heaped upon him by God in life, but just the reverse is true.
 
Lazarus was not poor, but “rich!”  Lazarus was a child of God. He was an heir of glory. He possessed enduring riches and righteousness. His name was in the Book of Life. His place was prepared for Him in heaven. He had the best of clothing-the righteousness of a Savior. He had the best of friends-God Himself was his advocate. He had the best of food-he had food to eat the world knew nothing of. And, best of all, he had these things forever. They supported him in life. They did not leave him in the hour of death. They went with him beyond the grave. They were with him in eternity. Surely in this point of view we may well say, not “poor Lazarus,” but “rich Lazarus.”
 
The rich man was pathetically poor.  With all of his riches he had no “treasure laid up in heaven.”  With all of his purple and fine linen he had no garment of righteousness. With all of his rich and successful friends he had no Friend and Advocate at God’s right hand. With all of his sumptuous food he had never tasted the bread of life. With his entire magnificent palace he had no home in the eternal world. Without God, without Christ, without faith, without grace, without forgiveness, without holiness, he lives to himself for a few short years, and then goes down hopelessly into the pit of hell. How hollow and unreal was all his prosperity! “The rich man was very poor.”
 
In this concluding conversation crafted by our Lord, it is a fictional rich man, it is a fictional Abraham.  Our Lord is inventing this dialogue to convey an answer to our question, “What took the rich man to hell?  What takes anyone to hell?  What took him there, and what will take his five brothers there, and what will take you there?”
Another reason why Jesus gives him a name in the story, because it’s critical to the story that everybody know who he is.  Because even when he asked, “Couldn’t Lazarus please come back, and then tell my brothers, warn my brothers of the afterlife?”  The only way that that would work would be if they knew who Lazarus was.  And, again, he has a name because it needs to be that everybody knew him in the family.  The rich man who’s dead knew him.  The five brothers knew him, and if he goes back, they’ll know him, and they’ll know that it’s the one who was at the door who died, and who disappeared, and now he’s back; and they’ll repent.  So they all knew him, and they all ignored him, all six of ‘em paid no attention to him.  They loved money, and they loved to consume it on themselves.  They were anything but generous.  They had no interest in the poor, and the Old Testament is loaded with instruction about that. 
 
Are we saved by philanthropy?  Are we saved by charity?  Are we saved by generosity?  Are we saved by compassion?  Are we saved by works…which we do?  Even acts of kindness and generosity and sympathy and philanthropy.  Well, Romans 2 says we’ll be judged by our works, sure.  We’ll be judged by our works.  James says the same thing.  We’re gonna be judged by our works.  Jesus even said, “By their fruit you will know them.”  We can be judged by our works, but we can’t be saved by our works.  Very important distinction. 
 
Ephesians chapter 2, says this.  “For by grace you have been saved through faith that not of yourselves.  It is the gift of God, not as a result of works, that no one should boast, for we are His workmanship.”  The only work that saves you is God’s work in regeneration, conversion, justification, sanctification, through faith in the Lord Jesus Christ.  This is all of divine grace, not of works.  But we are His workmanship created by God in Christ Jesus for good works.  We’re not saved by good works.  We’re saved to good works.  We’re not saved by doing good works.  We’re saved so that we can do good works.  Heaven is not earned by charity, nor is hell gained by the lack of it.  People end up in hell not for any of these reasons.  People end up in hell for one reason, and it comes clear to us in verses 27 to 31.
 
You would expect a conversation that Jesus fabricated to be almost infinite in its meaning, and this one is; but here’s the key. Verse 29, “They have Moses and the Prophets.”  Verse 31, “If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be persuaded.  Let them hear them.”  The reason people go to hell is because they do not listen to the Scripture.  They do not listen to the Scripture, for the Scripture, Old Testament and New Testament, is the way to Heaven.  It isn’t through your works.  There’s truth in the fact that your sin will send you to hell.  It will.  There’s truth in the fact that your selfishness will send you to hell; but being only a minimal sinner and being generous will not get you to Heaven.  It, too, will send you to hell.
 
The only way you get to Heaven is through listening to the way of salvation presented in the Scripture.  Here represented by the phrase, “Moses and the Prophets,” which was a Jewish expression referring to the Old Testament.  That brings up a very interesting, really interesting question.  Is there enough in the Old Testament for a Jew living then before Jesus’ death and before His resurrection to be saved?  How were people saved?  Romans 10:9 and 10, “If you confess Jesus as Lord and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you’ll be saved.”   Fine, that’s on this side of it.  What if Jesus hadn’t died?  What if He hadn’t arisen and you couldn’t believe in His death and resurrection, because it hadn’t happened?  Then what?  Well, let me give you one hint.  The word repent in verse 30.   That’s the heart and soul of it, repentance.  And the message of the Old Testament was crystal clear on the need for the sinner to repent, and it told him exactly where he needed to turn in his repentance to receive forgiveness and salvation.  It’s all in the Scripture in the Old Testament, and then comes into its glorious fulfillment and fruition in the New Testament. 
 
  
 
Additional Helps:
 
 
 
Commentaries on the word “hades” in this passage:
 
 16:22, 23 “Abraham’s bosom” is a Jewish figurative expression denoting the place of repose to which Lazarus was carried at his death. It is a synonym for “Paradise” (23:43; 2 Cor. 12:4) and “heaven.” “Hades” (v. 23) is another word for “hell.” The rabbis divided the state after death into a place for the righteous (Abraham’s Bosom, Paradise) and a place for the wicked (Hades). This is similar to the Greek concept of Hades, which likewise had two compartments. Some think that this passage suggests that Hades is the place for all the dead, with two regions: Abraham’s Bosom as the abode of the righteous, and a place of torment as the abode of the wicked. At the resurrection of Jesus, Abraham’s Bosom was emptied and all the righteous were led into heaven. The unrighteous dead await final judgment, when “Hades” will be cast into the “lake of fire” (Rev. 20:14), or “hell.” However, such an approach to this passage seems unwarranted. “Abraham’s Bosom” is simply a synonym for heaven and Paradise; hence, Paradise cannot be conceived as one compartment in “Hades” where the righteous await final expedition to heaven at Christ’s resurrection. Death for the believer is immediate fellowship with God in heaven, and for the unbeliever is immediate consignment to hell for all eternity.

Abraham’s Bosom=Paradise=Heaven
Hades=Hell=Lake of fire
Believer’s Study Bible. electronic ed. Nashville : Thomas Nelson, 1997, c1995, S. Lk 16:20

 
16:23 In Hades. The suggestion that a rich man would be excluded from heaven would have scandalized the Pharisees (see note on Mt 19:24); especially galling was the idea that a beggar who ate scraps from his table was granted the place of honor next to Abraham. “Hades” was the Gr. term for the abode of the dead. In the LXX, it was used to translate the Heb. Sheol, which referred to the realm of the dead in general, without necessarily distinguishing between righteous or unrighteous souls. However, in NT usage, “Hades” always refers to the place of the wicked prior to final judgment in hell. The imagery Jesus used paralleled the common rabbinical idea that Sheol had two parts, one for the souls of the righteous and the other for the souls of the wicked—separated by an impassable gulf. But there is no reason to suppose, as some do, that “Abraham’s bosom” spoke of a temporary prison for the souls of OT saints, who were brought to heaven only after He had actually atoned for their sins. Scripture consistently teaches that the spirits of the righteous dead go immediately into the presence of God (cf. 23:43; 2Co 5:8; Php 1:23). And the presence of Moses and Elijah on the Mount of Transfiguration (9:30) belies the notion that they were confined in a compartment of Sheol until Christ finished His work.

MacArthur, John: The MacArthur Study Bible : New American Standard Bible. Nashville : Thomas Nelson Publishers, 2006, S. Lk 16:23
 

16:23, 24 But that was not all. His soul, or conscious self, went to Hades. Hades is the Greek for the OT word Sheol, the state of departed spirits. In the OT period, it was spoken of as the abode of both saved and unsaved. Here it is spoken of as the abode of the unsaved, because we read that the rich man was in torments.

It must have come as a shock to the disciples when Jesus said that this rich Jew went to Hades. They had always been taught from the OT that riches were a sign of God’s blessing and favor. An Israelite who obeyed the Lord was promised material prosperity. How then could a wealthy Jew go to Hades? The Lord Jesus had just announced that a new order of things began with the preaching of John. Henceforth, riches are not a sign of blessing. They are a test of a man’s faithfulness in stewardship. To whom much is given, of him will much be required.
Verse 23 disproves the idea of “soul sleep,” the theory that the soul is not conscious between death and resurrection. It proves that there is conscious existence beyond the grave. In fact, we are struck by the extent of knowledge which the rich man had. He … saw Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom. He was even able to communicate with Abraham. Calling him Father Abraham, he begged for mercy, pleading that Lazarus might bring a drop of water and cool his tongue. There is, of course, a question as to how a disembodied soul can experience thirst and anguish from flame. We can only conclude that the language is figurative, but that does not mean that the suffering was not real.
OT Old Testament
MacDonald, William ; Farstad, Arthur: Believer’s Bible Commentary : Old and New Testaments. Nashville : Thomas Nelson, 1997, c1995, S. Lk 16:23
 
23–25. And in hell he lift up his eyes, being in torments. Between death and resurrection the immaterial part of man goes either to be with the Lord, if he is saved (II Cor 5:8; Phil 1:23), or into conscious torment as here. Resurrection reunites the body to the soul, and the state of existence continues to be either with Christ, or in the punishment of eternal duration (Mt 25:41, 46).

KJV Bible Commentary. Nashville : Thomas Nelson, 1997, c1994, S. 2052
 
16:23 Note the reversal of fortune from vv. 19–21. Here the rich man was suffering and Lazarus was at peace. Hades in the Old Testament was the place where the dead are gathered. It is also called Sheol in Ps. 16:10; 86:13. In the New Testament, Hades is often mentioned in a negative context (see 10:15; Matt. 11:23; 16:18). Hades is where the unrighteous dead dwell. Gehenna is the place where final judgment occurs (see 12:5; Matt. 5:22).
Radmacher, Earl D. ; Allen, Ronald Barclay ; House, H. Wayne: The Nelson Study Bible : New King James Version. Nashville : T. Nelson Publishers, 1997, S. Lk 16:23
 
86 ᾅδης [hades /hah·dace/] n pr loc. From 1 (as negative particle) and 1492; TDNT 1:146; TDNTA 22; GK 87; 11 occurrences; AV translates as “hell” 10 times, and “grave” once. 1 name Hades or Pluto, the god of the lower regions. 2 Orcus, the nether world, the realm of the dead. 3 later use of this word: the grave, death, hell. Additional Information: In Biblical Greek it is associated with Orcus, the infernal regions, a dark and dismal place in the very depths of the earth, the common receptacle of disembodied spirits. Usually Hades is just the abode of the wicked, Lu. 16:23, Rev. 20:13,14; a very uncomfortable place. TDNT.
n n: noun or neuter
pr pr: proper or pronoun
loc loc: locative
TDNT Theological Dictionary of the New Testament
TDNTA Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, Abridged in One Volume
GK Goodrick-Kohlenberger
AV Authorized Version
Strong, James: The Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible : Showing Every Word of the Text of the Common English Version of the Canonical Books, and Every Occurrence of Each Word in Regular Order. electronic ed. Ontario : Woodside Bible Fellowship., 1996, S. G86
 
 

Hades — that which is out of sight, a Greek word used to denote the state or place of the dead. All the dead alike go into this place. To be buried, to go down to the grave, to descend into hades, are equivalent expressions. In the LXX. this word is the usual rendering of the Hebrew sheol, the common receptacle of the departed (Gen. 42:38; Ps. 139:8; Hos. 13:14; Isa. 14:9). This term is of comparatively rare occurrence in the Greek New Testament. Our Lord speaks of Capernaum as being “brought down to hell” (hades), i.e., simply to the lowest debasement, (Matt. 11:23). It is contemplated as a kind of kingdom which could never overturn the foundation of Christ’s kingdom (16:18), i.e., Christ’s church can never die.
In Luke 16:23 it is most distinctly associated with the doom and misery of the lost.
In Acts 2:27–31 Peter quotes the LXX. version of Ps. 16:8–11, plainly for the purpose of proving our Lord’s resurrection from the dead. David was left in the place of the dead, and his body saw corruption. Not so with Christ. According to ancient prophecy (Ps. 30:3) he was recalled to life.
Easton, M.G.: Easton’s Bible Dictionary. Oak Harbor, WA : Logos Research Systems, Inc., 1996, c1897
 
 

HELL — the place of eternal punishment for the unrighteous. The NKJV and KJV use this word to translate Sheol and Hades, the Old and New Testament words, respectively, for the abode of the dead.
Hell also translates Gehenna, the Greek form of the Hebrew phrase that means “the vale of Hinnom”—a valley west and south of Jerusalem. In this valley the Canaanites worshiped Baal and the god Molech by sacrificing their children in a fire that burned continuously. Even Ahaz and Manasseh, kings of Judah, were guilty of this terrible, idolatrous practice (2 Chr. 28:3; 33:6).
The prophet Jeremiah predicted that God would visit such destruction upon Jerusalem that this valley would be known as the “Valley of Slaughter” (Jer. 7:31–34; 19:2, 6). In his religious reforms, King Josiah put an end to this worship. He defiled the valley in order to make it unfit even for pagan worship (2 Kin. 23:10).
In the time of Jesus the Valley of Hinnom was used as the garbage dump of Jerusalem. Into it were thrown all the filth and garbage of the city, including the dead bodies of animals and executed criminals. To consume all this, fires burned constantly. Maggots worked in the filth. When the wind blew from that direction over the city, its awfulness was quite evident. At night wild dogs howled as they fought over the garbage.
Jesus used this awful scene as a symbol of hell. In effect he said, “Do you want to know what hell is like? Look at Gehenna.” So hell may be described as God’s “cosmic garbage dump.” All that is unfit for heaven will be thrown into hell.
The word Gehenna occurs 12 times in the New Testament. Each time it is translated as “hell.”
With the exception of James 3:6, it is used only by Jesus (Matt. 5:22, 29–30; 10:28; 23:15, 33; Mark 9:43, 45, 47; Luke 12:5). In Matthew 5:22; 18:9; and Mark 9:47, it is used with “fire” as “hell fire.” So the word “hell” (Gehenna) as a place of punishment is used in the New Testament by Him who is the essence of infinite love.
In Mark 9:46 and 48, hell is described as a place where “their worm does not die and the fire is not quenched.” Repeatedly Jesus spoke of outer darkness and a furnace of fire, where there will be wailing, weeping, and gnashing of teeth (Matt. 8:12; 13:42, 50; 22:13; 24:51; 25:30; Luke 13:28). Obviously this picture is drawn from Gehenna.
The Book of Revelation describes hell as “a lake of fire burning with brimstone” (Rev. 19:20; 20:10, 14–15; 21:8). Into hell will be thrown the beast and the false prophet (Rev. 19:20). At the end of the age the devil himself will be thrown into it, along with death and Hades and all whose names are not in the Book of Life. “And they will be tormented day and night forever and ever” (Rev. 20:10b).
Because of the symbolic nature of the language, some people question whether hell consists of actual fire. Such reasoning should bring no comfort to the lost. The reality is greater than the symbol. The Bible exhausts human language in describing heaven and hell. The former is more glorious, and the latter more terrible, than language can express.
Youngblood, Ronald F. ; Bruce, F. F. ; Harrison, R. K. ; Thomas Nelson Publishers: Nelson’s New Illustrated Bible Dictionary. Nashville : T. Nelson, 1995
 
 86.     ᾅδης haidēs, hah´-dace; from 1 (as neg. particle) and 1492; prop. unseen, i.e.Hades” or the place (state) of departed souls:— grave, hell.

neg. neg. = negative, negatively
prop. prop. = properly
i.e. i.e. = that is
Strong, James: The New Strong’s Dictionary of Hebrew and Greek Words. Nashville : Thomas Nelson, 1997, c1996, S. H8674

 
 
 Hell. In the Old Testament this is the word generally and unfortunately used by our translators to render the Hebrew Sheol. It really means the place of the dead, the unseen world, without deciding whether it be the place of misery or of happiness. It is clear that in many passages of the Old Testament Sheol can only mean “the grave,” and is so rendered in the Authorized Version; see, for example, Gen. 37:35; 42:38; 1 Sam. 2:6; Job 14:13. In other passages, however, it seems to involve a notion of punishment, and is therefore rendered in the Authorized Version by the word “hell.” But in many cases this translation misleads the reader. In the New Testament “hell” is the translation of two words, Hades and Gehenna. The word Hades, like Sheol, sometimes means merely “the grave,” Acts 2:31; 1 Cor. 15:55; Rev. 20:13, or in general “the unseen world.” It is in this sense that the creeds say of our Lord, “He went down into hell,” meaning the state of the dead in general, without any restriction of happiness or misery. Elsewhere in the New Testament Hades is used of a place of torment, Matt. 11:23; Luke 16:23; 2 Pet. 2:4, etc.; consequently it has been the prevalent, almost the universal, notion that Hades is an intermediate state between death and resurrection, divided into two parts, one the abode of the blest and the other of the lost. It is used eleven times in the New Testament, and only once translated “grave.” 1 Cor. 15:55. The word most frequently used (occurring twelve times) in the New Testament for the place of future punishment is Gehenna or Gehenna of fire. This was originally the valley of Hinnom, south of Jerusalem, where the filth and dead animals of the city were cast out and burned; a fit symbol of the wicked and their destruction. [See Hinnom.]

Smith, William: Smith’s Bible Dictionary. Nashville : Thomas Nelson, 1997
 
 

Hell — derived from the Saxon helan, to cover; hence the covered or the invisible place. In Scripture there are three words so rendered:
(1.) Sheol, occurring in the Old Testament sixty-five times. This word sheol is derived from a root-word meaning “to ask,” “demand;” hence insatiableness (Prov. 30:15, 16). It is rendered “grave” thirty-one times (Gen. 37:35; 42:38; 44:29, 31; 1 Sam. 2:6, etc.). The Revisers have retained this rendering in the historical books with the original word in the margin, while in the poetical books they have reversed this rule.
In thirty-one cases in the Authorized Version this word is rendered “hell,” the place of disembodied spirits. The inhabitants of sheol are “the congregation of the dead” (Prov. 21:16). It is (a) the abode of the wicked (Num. 16:33; Job 24:19; Ps. 9:17; 31:17, etc.); (b) of the good (Ps. 16:10; 30:3; 49:15; 86:13, etc.).
Sheol is described as deep (Job 11:8), dark (10:21, 22), with bars (17:16). The dead “go down” to it (Num. 16:30, 33; Ezek. 31:15, 16, 17).
(2.) The Greek word hades of the New Testament has the same scope of signification as sheol of the Old Testament. It is a prison (1 Pet. 3:19), with gates and bars and locks (Matt. 16:18; Rev. 1:18), and it is downward (Matt. 11:23; Luke 10:15).
The righteous and the wicked are separated. The blessed dead are in that part of hades called paradise (Luke 23:43). They are also said to be in Abraham’s bosom (Luke 16:22).
(3.) Gehenna, in most of its occurrences in the Greek New Testament, designates the place of the lost (Matt. 23:33). The fearful nature of their condition there is described in various figurative expressions (Matt. 8:12; 13:42; 22:13; 25:30; Luke 16:24, etc.). (See HINNOM.)
Easton, M.G.: Easton’s Bible Dictionary. Oak Harbor, WA : Logos Research Systems, Inc., 1996, c1897

The Problem of Evil

Download MS Word version of this article!

The text below was edited from a transcript of a message called “Why Does Evil Dominate the World?” and from “The Origin of Evil” by John MacArthur.   www.gty.org

The Problem of Evil

I think in order to appropriately address the issue of the existence of evil, we must set aside all human considerations and focus on the nature of God and His righteous standard. Divine justice is where the discussion must begin. John MacArthur defines divine justice as an essential attribute of God whereby He infinitely, perfectly, and independently does exactly what He wants to do and when He wants to do it. Because He is the standard of justice, by very definition, whatever He does is inherently just.

God does not do something because it is good and right, but rather, the thing is good and right because God wills it and works it. By nature God is just and righteous and therefore whatever He does is just and right because of His nature. We as fallen humans cannot impose our own ideas onto our understanding of God’s working. So, the fundamental issue we must start at is to go to the scriptures to see how God Himself, in His perfect righteousness, decides to act. His actions will always be righteous and true.

Some would say that it can’t be true that God has both a full knowledge of evil and the full power to prevent it and still let it come into existence because that means He ordained it. However, if God had the full knowledge of it and the full power to deal with it and it exists, then He ordained it. Either He didn’t have the knowledge (not omniscient), or He didn’t have the power (not omnipotent), so you have to reinvent God.

There are some people who are just short answer folks. You say, “Where did evil come from?” And they’ll say, “Oh it came from Adam and Eve.” Really? How did it get introduced to Adam and Eve? “Well, oh yeah, that’s right, it came from the snake.” Well how did the snake get to a place where he could be embodied by Satan and how did Satan get to be Satan in which he was tempting people to do evil? “Oh well, he came from…oh, he came from heaven, didn’t he?”

So where did evil originate? Evil originated where? In heaven? Yes, evil originated in heaven in an angelic rebellion right under the nose of God. You think that was a shock? Then you don’t have a God who is absolutely omniscient. You think God couldn’t stop it once it got going? Couldn’t put an end to it right on the spot? Then you have a God who is not all powerful. No matter how you deal with it, if you sustain the biblical doctrine of God, God becomes ultimately responsible for the existence of evil.

Now when you boil all this down, there are a number of categories in which theodicies can be created. The first category is metaphysical. That is to say evil is inevitable. It is a corollary of good. It is necessary. It’s Yin Yang. It’s a necessary opposite of one thing that exists by the very metaphysics of its existence, the opposite can exist as well. It is not that God created evil. It is not that God ordained evil. It is that evil is because good is. It is simply a negation. It is simply a privation. It is the absence of the opposite of. If you have an infinity, you have a finitude. If you have a good, you have an evil.

There’s some truth in that to some limited degree metaphysically. There is also the more theological approach to that metaphysical idea and it is this, that because God created humanity good, the potential for evil existed within that creation and man exercising his will chose the evil. So it didn’t really come from God, it came from man. It didn’t really come from God, it came from Lucifer who made the same choice in heaven. That was strongly the argument of Augustine and Aquinas in ancient times. And there is truth in that. There is the holiness of God and there is the sinfulness of the creature. But it leaves too much to metaphysical inevitability and it asks the question, since good exists and evil must then exist, is that perpetually true? And when we get to heaven and the new heaven and the new earth because that is eternal and perfect good, will we always be staring down the barrel of potential evil again because it’s a metaphysical necessity?

There’s a second kind of theodicy. Let’s drop the metaphysical approach to theodicy and let’s introduce the autonomous theodicy, or theodicies. A number of people come into this category to develop their theodicies. This is the category that suggests the cause of evil is the abuse of free will. And again we’re back to our Arminian friends. This is the abuse of free will. And this basically says the highest good to God is free will. Free will trumps everything on God’s scale, even evil. God could have prevented evil, but He wanted free will to exist and when He allowed free will to exist, therefore evil exists because those free and autonomous creatures choose evil. And because free will was more important as a reality than eliminating evil, evil exists. Evil exists because God exalts free will. Free will trumps evil on God’s value scale so that God had to allow for the possibility of evil in order to preserve the more highly prized autonomy that protects Him from injustice. Again, the bottom line is you can’t make God responsible for anything, so the greatest good in the creation is free will; angels have a free will, at least initially; humans have a free will, they make choices, and that’s the greater good, that’s the higher value to God even if it means sin and evil exist. Humans must have the self determined freedom to act. If God acts as a primary cause for people’s choices, they would not be free. If God decided they would be coerced and compelled and that would violate their will and we should have a completely free will. That’s the highest good. This gets God off the hook again; at least it appears to on a shallow level. But again, it requires reinventing a God, who values your will over His own. This is inventing a God who values everybody’s will over His own and that’s not the God we read about in the Scripture.

If God knew people would choose sin and hell, why did He go ahead and create them anyway? Why did He design free will? He could decide what the noblest of all virtues was, why make it free will if it’s going to end up like this and you’re going to have to go to Plan B just to recover from the exercise of these myriad of free wills?

So you can see that an autonomous theodicy as a category has to deny the direct involvement of God as He is revealed to be in the Old Testament. Does He not know what people are going to do? Or is giving them the freedom to do it more important than the presence of evil? If God has both knowledge and power, then He had to give men the free will to start with and He knew exactly what they would do with it and He went ahead and gave it to them and therefore in the end He had to ordain evil. It doesn’t solve any problem except to diminish the glory of God.

To design a God with limited knowledge, to design a God with limited power, to design a God who is more concerned about the will of every single human being than His own will is to design a God that is not the biblical God. If God is not in total control of evil, if He has not ordained it, and if He does not have it under complete control at every millisecond of history, then this universe is out of control at the most crucial point. If God is not in control of this completely, then how and when will He get the knowledge and the power to get it under control? Would you rather have a God trying to get control of evil, or a God completely in control of it? Take your choice. But the God of the Bible is complete control of evil for His own purposes. It is really heresy to say that the world is full of evil apart from a predetermined plan and purpose by God that is far above the willy-nilly choices of people.

So what do we know up to now? Evil exists. God exists. God wills evil to exist. He did not create it. He could not create it. But He did not prevent it. He ordained it. He willed it. He willed it because He had a purpose for it. This is critical.

Let me put it to you simply: God is not responsible for evil. His creatures are. God is not responsible for evil. His creatures are. Everything that God created was “very Good”, everything. This is affirmed throughout the scripture. In Habakkuk 1:13, it says God’s “eyes are too pure to approve evil” and that He “can not look on wickedness with favor”. 1 Corinthians 14:33 says “God is not a God of confusion”. Confusion is a product of sin. 1 John 1:5 says “God is Light, and in Him there is no darkness at all”. James 1:13 says “God cannot be tempted by evil, and He Himself does not tempt anyone”. 1 John 2:16 explains that “all that is in the world,” all evil categorically, “the lust of the flesh and the lust of the eyes and the boastful pride of life, is not from the Father, but is from the world”. Psalm 5:4 says that He is “not a God who takes pleasure in wickedness; No evil dwells with You.” In fact, on a positive note, Isaiah 6, the antiphonal cry of the angels was that God was “Holy, holy, holy.” We see a glimpse of that, of course, when Jesus came into the world; God in human flesh. He was holy, harmless, undefiled, and separate from sinners. God is not evil. God does not do evil. He cannot be tempted to do evil. He never tempts anybody else to do evil. God is not responsible for evil.

The source of evil, the source of sin, is outside God. When God created angels and God created humans, he gave them intelligence. He gave them reason, and he gave them choice. And there is a sequence. I put those words in that order for a purpose. Intelligence gave them the ability to understand things. Reason gave them the ability to process that understanding toward behavior. And choice gave them the freedom to determine that behavior. Intelligence, reason, and choice. Bottom line: With what they knew, and with the ability they had to process that information, they would be brought to a choice. And whether angels or men, they would have the choice either to obey God or not to obey God.

Listen to this: To disobey God was to initiate evil. Evil is not the presence of something. Evil is the absence of righteousness. You can’t create evil, because evil doesn’t exist as a created entity. It doesn’t exist as a created reality. Evil is a negative. Evil is the absence of perfection. It’s the absence of holiness. It’s the absence of goodness. It’s the absence of righteousness. Evil became a reality only when creatures chose to disobey. Evil came into existence initially then in the fall of angels; and then next, in the fall of Adam and Eve. Just put it this way in your mind. Evil is not a created thing. Evil is not a substance. Evil is not an entity. Evil is not a being. Evil is not a force. Evil is not some floating spirit. Evil is a lack of moral perfection. God created absolute perfection. Wherever a lack of that exists, sin exists. And that cannot exist in the nature of God or in anything that God makes. Evil comes into existence when God’s creatures fall short of the standard of moral perfection.

Now, let me take it a step further. God did not create evil. He did not author evil. He did not make evil. But listen carefully, very important: God did decree to use evil as a part of his eternal plan. He will not be culpable for it. He did not bring it into existence. That would be impossible because God is good, all good and only good. Therefore, whatever comes out of Him is all good and only good. God can, therefore, produce only good. And what is evil but the absence of that good, which is a choice made by the reasonings based upon the information revealed to his creatures? But, God was not caught off guard. In fact, God decreed that evil would be part of his plan. He is not the creator of evil, and He is not the cause of evil. He did not bring evil into existence in a cosmic sense, and He did not and does not bring evil into existence in a personal sense. He is not the cause of sin, nor is He the cause of sins in the lives of people. But He does use it for His purposes. And that’s why in Isaiah 45:7 says that God creates “calamity”. Some older translations say He “creates evil”. That is a really poor translation, and not true. God does create “calamity”. And if you read the context of Isaiah 45:7, it is clear that judgment is the issue. God does not create evil, but God does bring judgment on evil, creating therefore the calamity by which evil is judged. Now, listen carefully: Scripture written by God always assigns the guilt and responsibility for all sin to creatures; never to God. Never to God. That’s all we know. I’ve taken you as deep as I can go. There’s nowhere else to go. That’s all we know. Beyond that, we operate in faith. We do know some things. We know God is holy, right? We know he is too pure to look on iniquity; can’t tolerate evil. We know He “tempts no man,” neither is tempted by any man. We know he is “Holy, holy, holy,” all the things we went through. “No evil dwells in Him.” “He is all light and no darkness.” We know that. We believe that. God is not the author of confusion. He is not the source of sin. We know that. We believe that. Sin comes into existence when the standard of moral perfection is not met, and that is an act based upon intellect, reason and choice made by his creatures.

If God had a purpose for evil, if God wills evil to exist, what is the purpose for evil?

Some great theologians and biblical scholars from the seventeen hundreds put together The Westminster Confession. In it, it says “God, from all eternity did, by the most wise and holy counsel of His own will, freely, and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass. Yet so as thereby neither is God the author of sin, nor is violence offered to the will of the creatures, nor is the liberty or contingency of second-hand causes taken away, but rather established.”

Sinfulness proceeds only from the creature and not from God who being most holy and righteous neither can be the author and approver of sin. But then the Westminster Confession says all that God decrees and all that God providentially brings to pass is all to the praise of His glory.

They got it right. The reason for God ordaining evil is for the praise of His glory.

So when the question comes up: Why would God allow sin? We can only speculate. There’s no specific statement. But I think you can make a fairly reasonable speculation beyond which I cannot go and it is this: What did sin coming into the world bring about? I would say it brought about three things. These are the three reasons why I believe God allowed evil.

Number one, it brought about the salvation of sinners, right? God had to allow sin. God had to decree sin in the plan, though never the author of it, in order that he might save sinners. Well, why did God want to save sinners? To put on display attributes that otherwise never would have been manifest. How is God going to show grace if there aren’t any sinners? How is God going to show mercy if there aren’t any sinners? That was a part of God’s nature that God wanted to display for His own glory throughout all eternity. So God provided a means in which he could demonstrate grace and demonstrate mercy. He also wanted to show love; love that is so far-reaching that it can reach even his own enemies who hate him. How’s He going to show that if he doesn’t have any enemies? So God allows evil in order that He might demonstrate grace and mercy and forgiveness and salvation.

Secondly, He allows evil in order that He might display his wrath; in order that he might put his wrath on display, his anger on display, his judgment on display. How would God ever reveal that part of His true and eternal nature if there were not an opportunity to judge sinners? And so all you can do is look at redemptive history, and you see the salvation of sinners and the damnation of sinners, and that is what goes on. And you ultimately see a place prepared for those who were damned and a place prepared for those who were saved. And you must conclude then that the eternal purpose of God was to save some and judge some in order that he might demonstrate both his grace and his wrath.

And then I’d like to throw a third thought in there. I believe that God allowed sin in order that he might forever destroy it. As long as His creatures have any measure of freedom, as long as his creatures have intelligence; that is, they can know and reason; that is, they can process that knowledge toward behavior and choice; that is, they can choose what to do. As long as they have that capacity, there is a potential for them to fall short of the standard, right? To make the wrong choice. So there is choice, and the potential of a wrong choice is there. A measure of freedom is given to the creatures by which they can choose to honor God, by which they can choose to dishonor Him. As long as that is there, then the reality, the potential reality of evil exists when the wrong choice is made. I believe that once the wrong choice is made, then God goes into action. And one, He can demonstrate his grace in salvation; two, He can demonstrate his wrath in judgment; and three, He can then finally destroy evil. It’s almost as if God wanted evil to come to the surface so that he could excise it. That’s what’s going to happen when the whole of redemptive history is complete; when all the saved are saved, and all the lost are cast into the lake of fire, then death and hell are thrown into the lake of fire. What does that mean? No more death, no more hell, no more judgment. Why? Because there won’t be any more sin. And when you go into heaven, there’s nothing there that smacks of a sinful world, right? There’s no more sorrow, no more sadness, no more sin, no more dying, no more death.

So I think God decreed evil within his plan, without creating it, for those three reasons: To save sinners, to judge sinners, and to once and for all and forever destroy evil. It was always potentiated. As long as it was possible, it would need to come to the surface so God could excise it.

Summing it up, there is no external cause of sin, outside the creature. There’s no force floating out there that God created. It is the absence of perfection. There is no deterministic cause and effect; that is to say, some fatalism. It’s just choice. Within God’s decree, he allowed for that choice, knew those choices would be made the way they were made, planned that into the decree in order to display both his grace, his wrath, and to put a final and eternal end to sin. But always: The one who chose evil was the source of it. In the case of Lucifer, he was the source of evil initially in the angelic realm. And he got a third of the other angels to get along with him and join. The same happened with Adam and Eve, only it had a different effect. With angels, they all sinned their own sin, and nobody’s sin passed to anybody else, because they don’t procreate. But in the case of Adam and Eve, when Adam and Eve made the wrong choice, all humanity went with them, because we all come out of the loins of Adam and Eve. So the source of evil is outside of God. The source of evil is the creature.

Let me ask you a simple question to help you answer the bigger question. Is God more glorious because of sin existing or less glorious? Throughout all the eons of eternity will God receive more glory from His creatures because sin existed.

All that really matters is the eternal glory of God!

Rom 3:5-6 But if our unrighteousness demonstrates the righteousness of God, what shall we say? The God who inflicts wrath is not unrighteous, is He? (I am speaking in human terms.) 6 May it never be! For otherwise, how will God judge the world?

Would you understand the righteousness of God if you didn’t understand unrighteousness?

Rom 5:8 But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.

Our being sinners allows God to put His great love on open display at the cross.

Rom 9:22-23 What if God, although willing to demonstrate His wrath and to make His power known, endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction? 23 And He did so to make known the riches of His glory upon vessels of mercy, which He prepared beforehand for glory.

God had to “endure with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction” so He could display His wrath and full eternal power. God also willed to make known, to display, His mercy to the “vessels of mercy, which He prepared beforehand for glory”.

Prior to sin, God was not worshipped fully for His righteousness against the backdrop of unrighteousness. He couldn’t demonstrate His great love until he showed it against enemy, rebel sinners.

Rom 9:17 For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, “FOR THIS VERY PURPOSE I RAISED YOU UP, TO DEMONSTRATE MY POWER IN YOU, AND THAT MY NAME MIGHT BE PROCLAIMED THROUGHOUT THE WHOLE EARTH.”

Isa 45:7 The One forming light and creating darkness, Causing well-being and creating calamity; I am the LORD who does all these.

In Job 38, 39, 40, and 42 God shows Job that His ways are too wonderful for him to understand, that he is insignificant and that he cannot find fault with the Almighty.

Job 38:1-7 Then the LORD answered Job out of the whirlwind and said, 2 “Who is this that darkens counsel By words without knowledge? 3 “Now gird up your loins like a man, And I will ask you, and you instruct Me! 4 “Where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth? Tell Me, if you have understanding, 5 Who set its measurements? Since you know. Or who stretched the line on it? 6 “On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, 7 When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? ….

Job 39:1-2 “Do you know the time the mountain goats give birth? Do you observe the calving of the deer? 2 “Can you count the months they fulfill, Or do you know the time they give birth? ….

Job 40:1-4 Then the LORD said to Job, 2 “Will the faultfinder contend with the Almighty? Let him who reproves God answer it.” 3 Then Job answered the LORD and said, 4 “Behold, I am insignificant; what can I reply to You? I lay my hand on my mouth.

Job 42:1-6 Then Job answered the LORD and said, 2 “I know that You can do all things, And that no purpose of Yours can be thwarted. 3 ‘Who is this that hides counsel without knowledge?’ “Therefore I have declared that which I did not understand, Things too wonderful for me, which I did not know.” 4 ‘Hear, now, and I will speak; I will ask You, and You instruct me.’ 5 “I have heard of You by the hearing of the ear; But now my eye sees You; 6 Therefore I retract, And I repent in dust and ashes.”

Tough talk from God and Job buckles and says “God, I have no right to question You, You are God and You have every right to put Your glory on full display.” And evil makes that happen. We will spend forever and ever in the presence of God extolling Him in ways that never would be possible had He not allowed and ordained (without ever creating or being the source of it) the evil that temporarily dominates the creation. And in His perfect timing, it will all be over and He will destroy this entire universe in a holocaust described by Peter as the elements melting with fervent heat and the creation of a new heaven and a new earth in which only eternal righteousness exists, but we will forever worship with an understanding of the full display of His glory.

May we thank God for the insight that comes to us from His Word. He’s told us why. It’s not left to mystery. I’m God, I do what I do for My own glory. How wonderful is it that He has chosen us to be part of that eternal assembly who will give Him glory and who will sing praise to the Lamb who was slain. May we be in awe of God, that He has chosen us to be a part of that redeemed community who will understand forever the glory that came and was fully displayed because of sin. What a privilege.

1 John Study – Authentic Christian or False Christian?

Download MS Word version of this article!

created by David Ellingson

 The apostle John was an eye-witness concerning the life of Jesus, the Word of Life.  He writes what he has heard, and seen, and looked at, and touched (1:1-3).  John testifies and proclaims these things so that we may have fellowship “with the Father and with His Son Jesus Christ” and “so that our joy may be made complete” (1:4).

 The overall theme of 1 John is “a recall to the fundamentals of the faith” or “back to the basics of Christianity.” The apostle deals with certainties, not opinions or conjecture. He expresses the absolute character of Christianity in very simple terms; terms that are clear and unmistakable, leaving no doubt as to the fundamental nature of those truths. A warm, conversational, and above all, loving tone occurs, like a father having a tender, intimate conversation with his children.

 First John also is pastoral, written from the heart of a pastor who has concern for his people. As a shepherd, John communicated to his flock some very basic, but vitally essential, principles reassuring them regarding the basics of the faith. He desired them to have joy regarding the certainty of their faith rather than being upset by the false teaching and current defections of some (1:4).

 The book’s viewpoint, however, is not only pastoral but also polemical; not only positive but also negative. John refutes the defectors with sound doctrine, exhibiting no tolerance for those who pervert divine truth. He labels those departing from the truth as “false prophets” (4:1), “those who are trying to deceive” (2:26; 3:7), and “antichrists” (2:18). He pointedly identifies the ultimate source of all such defection from sound doctrine as demonic (4:1–7).

 The constant repetition of 3 sub-themes reinforces the overall theme regarding faithfulness to the basics of Christianity: happiness (1:4), holiness (2:1), and security (5:13). By faithfulness to the basics, his readers will experience these 3 results continually in their lives. These 3 factors also reveal the key cycle of true spirituality in 1 John: a proper belief in Jesus produces obedience to His commands; obedience issues in love for God and fellow believers (e.g., 3:23, 24). When these 3 (sound faith, obedience, love) operate in concert together, they result in happiness, holiness and assurance. They constitute the evidence, the litmus test, of a true Christian. 

MacArthur, J. (2006). The MacArthur study Bible : New American Standard Bible. Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers.

 

True & Authentic Christians

 

False Christians/Non-Christians

 

Obey and Keep His Commandments

1 John 1:7 (NASB95)
(7) but if we walk in the Light as He Himself is in the Light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus His Son cleanses us from all sin.

1 John 2:3 (NASB95)
(3) By this we know that we have come to know Him, if we keep His commandments.
1 John 2:5-6 (NASB95)
(5) but whoever keeps His word, in him the love of God has truly been perfected. By this we know that we are in Him:
(6) the one who says he abides in Him ought himself to walk in the same manner as He walked.
1 John 2:13-14 (NASB95)
(13) I am writing to you, fathers, because you know Him who has been from the beginning. I am writing to you, young men, because you have overcome the evil one. I have written to you, children, because you know the Father.
(14) I have written to you, fathers, because you know Him who has been from the beginning. I have written to you, young men, because you are strong, and the word of God abides in you, and you have overcome the evil one.

1 John 2:29 (NASB95)
(29) If you know that He is righteous, you know that everyone also who practices righteousness is born of Him.
1 John 3:3 (NASB95)
(3) And everyone who has this hope fixed on Him purifies himself, just as He is pure.
1 John 3:6-7 (NASB95)
(6) No one who abides in Him sins; no one who sins has seen Him or knows Him.
(7) Little children, make sure no one deceives you; the one who practices righteousness is righteous, just as He is righteous;
1 John 3:9 (NASB95)
(9) No one who is born of God practices sin, because His seed abides in him; and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.
1 John 3:24 (NASB95)
(24) The one who keeps His commandments abides in Him, and He in him. We know by this that He abides in us, by the Spirit whom He has given us.
1 John 4:6 (NASB95)
(6) We are from God; he who knows God listens to us; he who is not from God does not listen to us. By this we know the spirit of truth and the spirit of error.
1 John 5:2-5 (NASB95)
(2) By this we know that we love the children of God, when we love God and observe His commandments.
(3) For this is the love of God, that we keep His commandments; and His commandments are not burdensome.
(4) For whatever is born of God overcomes the world; and this is the victory that has overcome the world—our faith.
(5) Who is the one who overcomes the world, but he who believes that Jesus is the Son of God?
1 John 5:18 (NASB95)
(18) We know that no one who is born of God sins; but He who was born of God keeps him, and the evil one does not touch him.

 

 

Disobey and Neglect His Commandments

1 John 1:6 (NASB95)
(6) If we say that we have fellowship with Him and yet walk in the darkness, we lie and do not practice the truth;
1 John 2:4 (NASB95)
(4) The one who says, “I have come to know Him,” and does not keep His commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him;
1 John 3:4 (NASB95)
(4) Everyone who practices sin also practices lawlessness; and sin is lawlessness.

1 John 3:6b (NASB95)
(6) … no one who sins has seen Him or knows Him.
1 John 3:8a (NASB95)
(8) the one who practices sin is of the devil; for the devil has sinned from the beginning…

1 John 3:10 (NASB95)
(10) By this the children of God and the children of the devil are obvious: anyone who does not practice righteousness is not of God, nor the one who does not love his brother.
1 John 4:6 (NASB95)
(6) We are from God; he who knows God listens to us; he who is not from God does not listen to us. By this we know the spirit of truth and the spirit of error.

 

Love

1 John 2:7-8 (NASB95)
(7) Beloved, I am not writing a new commandment to you, but an old commandment which you have had from the beginning; the old commandment is the word which you have heard.
(8) On the other hand, I am writing a new commandment to you, which is true in Him and in you, because the darkness is passing away and the true Light is already shining.
1 John 2:10 (NASB95)
(10) The one who loves his brother abides in the Light and there is no cause for stumbling in him.
1 John 3:11 (NASB95)
(11) For this is the message which you have heard from the beginning, that we should love one another;
1 John 3:14a (NASB95)
(14) We know that we have passed out of death into life, because we love the brethren…
1 John 3:16 (NASB95)
(16) We know love by this, that He laid down His life for us; and we ought to lay down our lives for the brethren.
1 John 3:18-22 (NASB95)
(18) Little children, let us not love with word or with tongue, but in deed and truth.
(19) We will know by this that we are of the truth, and will assure our heart before Him
(20) in whatever our heart condemns us; for God is greater than our heart and knows all things.
(21) Beloved, if our heart does not condemn us, we have confidence before God;
(22) and whatever we ask we receive from Him, because we keep His commandments and do the things that are pleasing in His sight.
1 John 4:7 (NASB95)
(7) Beloved, let us love one another, for love is from God; and everyone who loves is born of God and knows God.
1 John 4:9-14 (NASB95)
(9) By this the love of God was manifested in us, that God has sent His only begotten Son into the world so that we might live through Him.
(10) In this is love, not that we loved God, but that He loved us and sent His Son to be the propitiation for our sins.
(11) Beloved, if God so loved us, we also ought to love one another.
(12) No one has seen God at any time; if we love one another, God abides in us, and His love is perfected in us.
(13) By this we know that we abide in Him and He in us, because He has given us of His Spirit.
(14) We have seen and testify that the Father has sent the Son to be the Savior of the world.
1 John 4:16-19 (NASB95)
(16) We have come to know and have believed the love which God has for us. God is love, and the one who abides in love abides in God, and God abides in him.
(17) By this, love is perfected with us, so that we may have confidence in the day of judgment; because as He is, so also are we in this world.
(18) There is no fear in love; but perfect love casts out fear, because fear involves punishment, and the one who fears is not perfected in love.
(19) We love, because He first loved us.
1 John 4:21 (NASB95)
(21) And this commandment we have from Him, that the one who loves God should love his brother also.

 

Not Loving

1 John 2:9 (NASB95)
(9) The one who says he is in the Light and yet hates his brother is in the darkness until now.
1 John 2:11 (NASB95)
(11) But the one who hates his brother is in the darkness and walks in the darkness, and does not know where he is going because the darkness has blinded his eyes.
1 John 3:10 (NASB95)
(10) By this the children of God and the children of the devil are obvious: anyone who does not practice righteousness is not of God, nor the one who does not love his brother.
1 John 3:14 (NASB95)
(14) We know that we have passed out of death into life, because we love the brethren. He who does not love abides in death.
1 John 3:15 (NASB95)
(15) Everyone who hates his brother is a murderer; and you know that no murderer has eternal life abiding in him.
1 John 3:17 (NASB95)
(17) But whoever has the world’s goods, and sees his brother in need and closes his heart against him, how does the love of God abide in him?
1 John 4:8 (NASB95)
(8) The one who does not love does not know God, for God is love.
1 John 4:20 (NASB95)
(20) If someone says, “I love God,” and hates his brother, he is a liar; for the one who does not love his brother whom he has seen, cannot love God whom he has not seen.

Belief

1 John 2:20-21 (NASB95)
(20) But you have an anointing from the Holy One, and you all know.
(21) I have not written to you because you do not know the truth, but because you do know it, and because no lie is of the truth.
1 John 2:23b (NASB95)
(23) … the one who confesses the Son has the Father also.

1 John 2:24-25 (NASB95)
(24) As for you, let that abide in you which you heard from the beginning. If what you heard from the beginning abides in you, you also will abide in the Son and in the Father.
(25) This is the promise which He Himself made to us: eternal life.
1 John 2:27-28 (NASB95)
(27) As for you, the anointing which you received from Him abides in you, and you have no need for anyone to teach you; but as His anointing teaches you about all things, and is true and is not a lie, and just as it has taught you, you abide in Him.
(28) Now, little children, abide in Him, so that when He appears, we may have confidence and not shrink away from Him in shame at His coming.
1 John 3:23 (NASB95)
(23) This is His commandment, that we believe in the name of His Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, just as He commanded us.
1 John 4:2 (NASB95)
(2) By this you know the Spirit of God: every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God;
1 John 4:15 (NASB95)
(15) Whoever confesses that Jesus is the Son of God, God abides in him, and he in God.

1 John 5:1 (NASB95)
(1) Whoever believes that Jesus is the Christ is born of God, and whoever loves the Father loves the child born of Him.
1 John 5:9-10a (NASB95)
(9) If we receive the testimony of men, the testimony of God is greater; for the testimony of God is this, that He has testified concerning His Son.
(10) The one who believes in the Son of God has the testimony in himself…

1 John 5:11-12a (NASB95)
(11) And the testimony is this, that God has given us eternal life, and this life is in His Son.
(12) He who has the Son has the life…

1 John 5:13-15 (NASB95)
(13) These things I have written to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, so that you may know that you have eternal life.
(14) This is the confidence which we have before Him, that, if we ask anything according to His will, He hears us.
(15) And if we know that He hears us in whatever we ask, we know that we have the requests which we have asked from Him.
1 John 5:20-21 (NASB95)
(20) And we know that the Son of God has come, and has given us understanding so that we may know Him who is true; and we are in Him who is true, in His Son Jesus Christ. This is the true God and eternal life.
(21) Little children, guard yourselves from idols.

Disbelief

1 John 2:19 (NASB95)
(19) They went out from us, but they were not really of us; for if they had been of us, they would have remained with us; but they went out, so that it would be shown that they all are not of us.
1 John 2:22-23a (NASB95)
(22) Who is the liar but the one who denies that Jesus is the Christ? This is the antichrist, the one who denies the Father and the Son.
(23) Whoever denies the Son does not have the Father…

1 John 4:3 (NASB95)
(3) and every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God; this is the spirit of the antichrist, of which you have heard that it is coming, and now it is already in the world.
1 John 5:10b (NASB95)
(10) … the one who does not believe God has made Him a liar, because he has not believed in the testimony that God has given concerning His Son.
1 John 5:12 (NASB95)
(12) … he who does not have the Son of God does not have the life.

Not Worldy

1 John 2:15a (NASB95)
(15) Do not love the world nor the things in the world…
1 John 2:17 (NASB95)
(17) The world is passing away, and also its lusts; but the one who does the will of God lives forever.
1 John 3:12-13 (NASB95)
(12) [love one another,] not as Cain, who was of the evil one and slew his brother. And for what reason did he slay him? Because his deeds were evil, and his brother’s were righteous.
(13) Do not be surprised, brethren, if the world hates you.

1 John 4:4 (NASB95)
(4) You are from God, little children, and have overcome them; because greater is He who is in you than he who is in the world.
1 John 5:19 (NASB95)
(19) We know that we are of God, and that the whole world lies in the power of the evil one.

Worldy

1 John 2:15b-16 (NASB95)
(15) … If anyone loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him.
(16) For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh and the lust of the eyes and the boastful pride of life, is not from the Father, but is from the world.
1 John 3:1b (NASB95)
(1) … For this reason the world does not know us, because it did not know Him.

1 John 4:5-6 (NASB95)
(5) They are from the world; therefore they speak as from the world, and the world listens to them.
(6) We are from God; he who knows God listens to us; he who is not from God does not listen to us. By this we know the spirit of truth and the spirit of error.
1 John 5:19b (NASB95)
(19) … the whole world lies in the power of the evil one.

Forgiveness of Sins

1 John 1:9 (NASB95)
(9) If we confess our sins, He is faithful and righteous to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1 John 2:1-2 (NASB95)
(1) My little children, I am writing these things to you so that you may not sin. And if anyone sins, we have an Advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous;
(2) and He Himself is the propitiation for our sins; and not for ours only, but also for those of the whole world.
1 John 2:12 (NASB95)
(12) I am writing to you, little children, because your sins have been forgiven you for His name’s sake.

 

Admission of Sin

1 John 1:8 (NASB95)
(8) If we say that we have no sin, we are deceiving ourselves and the truth is not in us.
1 John 1:10 (NASB95)
(10) If we say that we have not sinned, we make Him a liar and His word is not in us.

 

God

1 John 1:5 (NASB95)
(5) This is the message we have heard from Him and announce to you, that God is Light, and in Him there is no darkness at all.

Jesus His Son

1 John 3:5 (NASB95)
(5) You know that He appeared in order to take away sins; and in Him there is no sin.
1 John 3:8b (NASB95)
(8) … The Son of God appeared for this purpose, to destroy the works of the devil.